MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-08-03 04:00 pm (UTC)(link)

(Anonymous) 2016-08-05 12:58 pm (UTC)(link)
when your meme exclusive friend joins a game and your tags dry up faster than the state of california

(Anonymous) 2016-08-05 03:59 pm (UTC)(link)
As much as I understand why it would happen.... +1 feels bad man

(Anonymous) 2016-08-05 05:24 pm (UTC)(link)
i think i'm this friend :( sorry anon

(Anonymous) 2016-08-05 07:58 pm (UTC)(link)
feeling it, yeah. completely understand why the reshuffling of priorities of meme tags occurs, but still sucks. especially if you can't bring your character to your friend's game for whatever reason. and doesn't help with gmail notifs being broken lately.

(Anonymous) 2016-08-17 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)
when your meme exclusive friend joins three games

it's like welp. time to move on.

(Anonymous) 2016-08-17 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)
... i'm sorry, were you expecting sympathy?

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-17 21:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-18 03:21 (UTC) - Expand

NEW GENERATION OF MEME CREEPERS

(Anonymous) 2016-08-05 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)
who are the new mikes, yuri brigade, etc?

Re: NEW GENERATION OF MEME CREEPERS

(Anonymous) 2016-08-05 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
none, because no one responses to top levels at all anymore.

+10000

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-07 21:04 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-08 02:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NEW GENERATION OF MEME CREEPERS

(Anonymous) 2016-08-07 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)
you are why memes are dead

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-08-05 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
More general? You get pumped for an uncommon muse of any muse from some canon only to realize ONE person is playing everyone from that canon. Maybe I should just reply anyway... But it always deters me

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-08-05 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
By of I meant or


Duh

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-08-06 02:04 am (UTC)(link)
Get over it and potentially have fun or don't. It really is that simple.

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-06 21:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-08-07 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
if that one person's a creeper, maybe you/somebody else could repost the rare muse meme? that tends to draw obscure canons out of the woodwork

http://1800.dreamwidth.org/1389.html?thread=37741#cmt37741

(Anonymous) 2016-08-08 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
tmw someone's clearly trying to make the reverse prompt meme a thing and failing.

Re: http://1800.dreamwidth.org/1389.html?thread=37741#cmt37741

(Anonymous) 2016-08-10 06:09 am (UTC)(link)
i'm in favor of reverse prompt memes in general if for no other reason than at least they don't produce another generic sea of toplevels like every other meme

plus the regular prompt memes are just completely flake central

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-08-10 06:40 am (UTC)(link)
putting an oc into a mid-fuck meme. claiming they don't have enough cr with another character for smut.

l m a o

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-08-10 10:05 am (UTC)(link)
C'mon anon, you gotta WORK for that superior oc booty.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-10 18:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-11 18:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-11 18:52 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-11 23:02 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-12 00:08 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-12 02:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-12 19:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
why is every meme awful

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
because mememakers long ago gave up on original memes when they always got 10 or less tags and so they now just endlessly recycle the most popular stuff (which, surprise of surprises, is always either braindead ooc shit like tfln and the "gen" texting meme or toplevel city like every picture/quote prompt meme ever)

http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3579634.html?thread=1673895922#cmt1673895922

(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 12:50 pm (UTC)(link)
stop. stop doing this to people. just suck it up and write a starter.

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3579634.html?thread=1673895922#cmt1673895922

(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 01:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Something something can you write the starter?

U W U

W

U

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3579634.html?thread=1673895922#cmt1673895922

(Anonymous) 2016-08-14 06:04 pm (UTC)(link)
calm your tits, anon. they said they're willing to write the starter right off the bat.

as fucking flaky as people are about ignoring starters because "it's not what they were secretly hoping for but the person tagging them didn't read their mind," i can't blame people at all for trying to narrow it down a little at first. there's a huge difference between what they did and what starter fishers pull.

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-08-14 18:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-08-16 04:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I've been excited to have my toplevels tagged lately, but every time, the tagger gives me no hook to respond to and the characters seem bland. it's a bummer.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-08-17 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm not judging their ability to write or grasp of character for it but man is it distracting as hell once I notice white blobs on every icon of this person's set