itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) 2016-09-15 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)

Re: itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) 2016-09-15 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
yes

it really should be otac. open to all cocks.

Re: itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 02:33 am (UTC)(link)
search your feelings anon

you already have the answer

Re: itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 04:59 am (UTC)(link)
not really

sometimes female characters are ota and they want f/m

Re: itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 05:33 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 06:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 16:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 05:12 am (UTC)(link)
Not for everyone. I usually put my guys up as OTA and I mean really OTA, I like het pairings but I have a few m/m pairings I'm willing to do with said male muses.

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 05:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 06:04 am (UTC)(link)
It means OTA for me, I actually want M/F more than M/M at most times. The problem is my character gets tagged by the shy or less forward types of female characters who they'd canonically not be interested in, while the guys they get tagged by are more forward.

In canon he wouldn't even look at naïve types or play the hotcold game when he could find a woman more forward or interested. Why am I expected to do all the work to make chemistry happen?

My character is male, that does not mean he is going to sexually harass your character to get a thread moving.

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 06:47 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 18:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 19:02 (UTC) - Expand

+100

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 18:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 22:40 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 02:19 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 03:40 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 03:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 06:45 am (UTC)(link)
sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't. it's almost like people aren't a hivemind

Re: itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 06:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 08:09 am (UTC)(link)
I feel like this exact thread appears at least once every other post.

Re: itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 15:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 06:18 pm (UTC)(link)
i think most of the time 'ota' does mean 'open to all', but i will occasionally run into some people on bakerstreet that put 'ota' to strictly mean open to all the prompts listed in the meme but not open to to both */m and */f. but that is pretty rare.

Re: itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) 2016-09-17 04:21 am (UTC)(link)
if i put ota i mean ota

i can see why some others would think that, though :(

Re: itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) 2016-09-17 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
this is a dumb argument that needs to just fuck off and die. whether they mean it or not doesn't matter. f/m doesnt mean they'll tag all the fs. m/m doesn't mean they'll tag all the ms. ota doesn't mean they'll tag everyone that tags them.

shut up.

Re: itt does ota really mean m/m only?

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 04:27 (UTC) - Expand

http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) 2016-09-15 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
i feel like this could have been put in a musebox or something

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) 2016-09-15 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
and yet it wasn't, because maybe people want to see if others like what they like so they can drag more people to a musebox with them.

stop hating fun so much. no one's pissing on your lawn.

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-15 23:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 16:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 23:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 00:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 02:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 02:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 02:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 03:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 04:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 04:15 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 04:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 05:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 05:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 06:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 06:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 07:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 11:42 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 22:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 02:06 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 02:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3648758.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 02:24 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-09-15 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
i know ugh tumblr but i was having a conversation with someone about a celebrity who is a literal pedophile, served time, created child porn, etc. because they got an ask about the guy and explained why he didn't support the celeb. i chimed in and the original anon basically kept bothering my friend because they don't see the problem with it! they can separate the artists work from who they are! there's no problem what's the problem! explain it to me if there is!

he tried and failed and so did i and i can't tell if the anon is just butt mad that he has a truly legitimately "problematic fav" or really wants an explanation on what the harm is and i basically said that turning a blind eye is just as well as condoning it. if you do it and everyone else does it because it's just one person doing it, it still effects it all. but the anon still doesn't seem to get the issue because it's the artists product not saying that the artist is ok.

is there a better way to articulate why it's a problem? i also tried using geek social fallacies and talking about predators (because the celeb literally has a reported history even after serving time, which imho wasn't even enough) but this is really bothering me. i don't think i can ever get them to understand and i'll probably just block them but can anyone else explain why it's an inherently wrong thing to do, even if what they produce had nothing to do with their crime?

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
i think the problem here is finding a middle point. if someone doesn't support the celeb because of those reasons, that's total legit, and that anon sounds annoying as fuck. anon should respect the answer and move on, period.

that said, still watching a movie or reading a book that comes from a legit bad person? i don't see the problem with that. no, consuming is not condoning it, so as long as you admit the artist is an asshole. defending the artist and saying "but they did good things!!!" it's the problem. saying "yeah they deserve the wort but i like this book" is not.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 01:19 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 01:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 02:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 01:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 00:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 01:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 02:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 02:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 06:38 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 06:46 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 23:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 10:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 11:39 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 14:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 23:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 15:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 23:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 17:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 23:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-18 15:18 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
Palpatine felt a pleasant tingle shoot through him when Sora touched his chest that way. "No apology needed, you told me you weren't in the mood and I didn't heed your warning," he replied. "Though I hope you won't be offended if I... take care of business. I can be quick." He gestured downwards; he was still sporting a raging hard-on, naturally.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 05:29 am (UTC)(link)
Naturally.

http://v.dreamwidth.org/9227468/2414808

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 01:25 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm not sure what's bothering me more here: Made By Me's trademark terrible image quality and definitive cropping misdeeds, or the creepy look of the canon image being used.

Re: http://v.dreamwidth.org/9227468/2414808

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
gj made by me, you've made the only kamala khan icon anyone will ever need. this one jpg completely encapsulates her character

creepy and crappy

Re: http://v.dreamwidth.org/9227468/2414808

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 19:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://v.dreamwidth.org/9227468/2414808

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 19:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://v.dreamwidth.org/9227468/2414808

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 23:00 (UTC) - Expand

https://66.media.tumblr.com/e82d5f3b9178828c96b8b22a5c636725/tumblr_od63unDqkX1vylzyco1_540.png

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 06:10 pm (UTC)(link)
i feel like this picture encapsulates everything unfunny and tryhard about tfln

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 07:12 pm (UTC)(link)
tfln sucks, but it's an unusually good way to meet new muses. which probably says something about the ~~~state of dw rp~~~

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 22:56 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 07:47 pm (UTC)(link)
So I'm reading this Far Shore wank and I'm just thinking, wow, there is absolutely zero upside to being a mod in this hobby, is there.

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 07:58 pm (UTC)(link)
i really enjoyed being able to know that i was facilitating free fun for a couple hundred people

the rest of it was a stinking pile of shit

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 07:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 08:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 06:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 08:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 08:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 08:49 (UTC) - Expand

-1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 20:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 15:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 18:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 19:11 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)
TLFN

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
total losers feigning notoriety

aka rpers living vicariously through their characters being ~wacky~ twenty somethings who go out, get laid, and have fun while the actual players are shut-in spoon counting nerds

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 22:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 23:36 (UTC) - Expand

+ 1000000000000000

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 23:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 00:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 01:14 (UTC) - Expand

http://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/67651.html?thread=213708099#cmt213708099

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
what's going on with the weird preferences gatekeeping here (the danny rand thread) and at rpanons?

Re: http://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/67651.html?thread=213708099#cmt213708099

(Anonymous) 2016-09-16 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
"gatekeeping"

tumblr --------------------- >

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 23:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-16 23:45 (UTC) - Expand

http://i.imgur.com/lm3CdPU.jpg

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 00:29 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 01:19 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 03:27 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 05:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 00:33 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 00:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 01:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 01:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 01:48 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 04:25 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: http://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/67651.html?thread=213708099#cmt213708099

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 04:22 (UTC) - Expand

FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) 2016-09-17 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
Can relate to fandom in general or specific fandoms.

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) 2016-09-17 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
plotbunny

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 00:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 01:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 01:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 01:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 02:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 02:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 03:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 07:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 10:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 13:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 20:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 21:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 21:31 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 02:03 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 02:22 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 03:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 06:36 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 17:48 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 21:07 (UTC) - Expand

+.5

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 18:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 02:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 02:35 (UTC) - Expand

-1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 03:01 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 03:35 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 04:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 03:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 04:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 05:46 (UTC) - Expand

+.5

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 04:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 04:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 08:30 (UTC) - Expand

+1.5

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 05:36 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 14:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 03:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 04:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 06:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 08:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 16:28 (UTC) - Expand

sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 16:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 06:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 06:20 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 07:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 14:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 06:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 07:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 07:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FANDOM TERMS YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 15:28 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 19:12 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-09-17 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
Foxface
I don't mean to sound totally racist but black people do this when they get angry actually lol. AND ITS NOT RACIST BECAUSE IT HAPPENS.

yikes. yikes yikes.

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2016-09-17 01:21 am (UTC)(link)
they probably do actually do whatever he's saying they do

that said he should have never admitted it because any talk of our genetic throwbacks as anything other than precious perfect oppressed cinnamon buns (ps COPS ARE PIGS ALL COPS DIE!) guarantees the klaxons going off in sjw hedquarters

(frozen comment) (no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 01:29 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) (no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 01:46 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) (no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 02:25 (UTC) - Expand

INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) 2016-09-17 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
cuz we've all seen that one thing flooding our dashes/timelines that just annoyed the shit out of us in some way.

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) 2016-09-17 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
JOHN CENA

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 03:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 21:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 03:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 03:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 03:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 04:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 08:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 14:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 03:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 04:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 04:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 04:36 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 04:50 (UTC) - Expand

+ 2

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 05:12 (UTC) - Expand

+.5

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 05:50 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 11:55 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 12:05 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 12:53 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 14:53 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 20:45 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 20:49 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 21:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 05:18 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 08:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 05:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 10:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 11:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 05:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 06:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 07:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 14:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 07:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 07:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 07:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 14:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 14:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 18:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 05:52 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 06:00 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 15:33 (UTC) - Expand

-1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 17:55 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 22:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 08:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 14:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 14:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 21:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 15:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 20:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 21:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 21:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: INTERNET MEMES YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 19:40 (UTC) - Expand

HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) 2016-09-17 05:02 pm (UTC)(link)
because sometimes a thing's haters are more annoying than the thing could ever be

Re: HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) 2016-09-17 05:33 pm (UTC)(link)
i haye what you love

i love what you hate

Re: HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 19:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 19:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-18 03:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 20:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 21:21 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 21:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 20:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 21:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 21:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 21:31 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 21:58 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 22:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 20:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 22:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 22:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-17 22:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: HATE YOU HATE

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-18 00:59 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-09-17 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Mods, can we please get a new post? It's been over two weeks and this shit is getting embarrassing.

Re: NEW POST

(Anonymous) - 2016-09-18 00:34 (UTC) - Expand

Page 4 of 4

<< [1] [2] [3] [4] >>