MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-07-15 06:14 pm (UTC)(link)

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-07-16 04:51 am (UTC)(link)
Not so much pet peeves but stupid shit. I know folks hate my character but I'm gonna tag anyway! Just gonna do it.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-07-17 04:47 am (UTC)(link)

(Anonymous) 2017-07-16 06:16 am (UTC)(link)
might be the same as anon above but uh, that midnightdoctor sure is tagging every superhero on the gen texts meme in extremely awkward fashion

(Anonymous) 2017-07-16 06:26 am (UTC)(link)
it's an obvious self-insert oc which has been doing the same for several dc/marvel characters, mostly live action but not only limited to those.

apparently it thinks having anna kendrick as a pb will endear the crowd who play such characters to it. should just take the hint when the majority of them don't tag back. this is a prime example of ocs under the universal no go zone of forced closeness to actual canon characters.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-16 06:30 am (UTC)(link)
Their icons make me sad... The blur. It's so 2005 default-lj-upload icon cropping

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 06:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 06:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 07:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 07:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 07:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 08:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 08:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 08:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 08:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 08:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 08:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 08:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 08:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 09:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 09:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 09:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 09:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 09:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 09:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 22:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 23:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-17 04:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-17 05:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-17 05:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-17 18:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-17 21:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-17 14:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-07-18 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
can we just ban that one m/m spammer

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-07-19 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
but anon! they're such an Internet tough guy!!!!

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-07-19 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
can we just ban m/m

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-25 21:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-07-19 05:28 am (UTC)(link)
please

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-07-19 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
i always think people are overexaggerating about how thirsty f/f players are

then i leave an ota comment on tlh and then i remember

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-07-19 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
tlh is a cancer zone though, that's like saying "I always think people are exaggerating how bad it would be to jump in a volcano so I tried it"

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-19 23:00 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-19 23:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 00:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 00:31 (UTC) - Expand

sa

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 01:08 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 01:20 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 09:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 11:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 11:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 13:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 13:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-23 12:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-23 17:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-23 03:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-07-20 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
onewithwater is always watching.

Always.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-07-20 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
i know who you are and i know you weren't going to tag anyone back except pretty, white live action guys (who you will flake on within a few tags anyway) so this shouldn't be a problem for you

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 01:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 03:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 03:15 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 19:33 (UTC) - Expand

dda

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 19:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 03:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-20 03:33 (UTC) - Expand

http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/4354691.html?thread=1959005315#cmt1959005315

(Anonymous) 2017-07-21 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)
> M/M

You, uh, you hiding something there, Tifa?

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/4354691.html?thread=1959005315#cmt1959005315

(Anonymous) 2017-07-21 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)
that's embarrassing... i feel bad

but not rly worth bringing here honestly, esp since it's not rly a pet peeve ... it's just a dumb typo

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/4354691.html?thread=1959005315#cmt1959005315

(Anonymous) 2017-07-22 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
is that the tifa who tagged some FF guy that was m/m with *dangles tifa*

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/4354691.html?thread=1959005315#cmt1959005315

(Anonymous) 2017-07-22 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
materia >>>>> testosterone

(Anonymous) 2017-07-23 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
People who abbreviate the name of their canon on top levels and then don't have any information/links about the character on their journal. Either they don't actually want to be tagged, or they're just holding out for people who are into that series and recognize the icons or something.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-24 06:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Let's be real. Even if they had a full canon name you weren't going to tag them in the first place.

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-24 18:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-07-24 02:20 am (UTC)(link)
[ f/f only for this one, for straight fun with D.Va look up there. ]

this rubs me the wrong way, idk

(Anonymous) 2017-07-26 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
why? there is nothing venomous about this statement

(Anonymous) 2017-07-28 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
That moment when you have great threads going with the other player looking like they're having as much fun as you do, exchanging little jokes off topic and all that jazz.

Until they suddenly drop everything, but keep tagging other people after a discreet period of time has passed, probably hoping that you won't notice.

Is it really that hard to say 'hey, i'm no longer feeling this, sorry'? Like, I know I'm not the best player around dwrp, but I'm definitely not the worst and I always try to make an effort to give the person tagging me something to work with. The only thing this radio silence bullshit accomplishes is to make the other player feel too awkward to ask what happened.

Yes, yes, take a hint and all that, I know.

But it's just so frustrating, seeing players with whom you were having a good time ditch you just like that, while the crappy tlh crew and the likes seem to amass shitty threads after shitty threads.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-28 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
or maybe some shit came up and they had to drop everything, and what you're describing as "tagging other people after a discreet period of time has passed" might be them catching up on fucking rp. jfc, i'd have some sympathy for you if not for the paranoia and piss poor attempt at mind reading.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-28 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
this feeling can definitely suck but the best thing you can do is reach out to them, anon!

if they dropped your thread(s) silently and abruptly, you should be able to get a decent feel for whether they did it because they’re bored/burnt out/whatever by how they respond (if they don’t come right out and say as much themselves). if it felt like their interest was slowly petering out and they confirm that they lost interest, you’ll have closure on the issue and you’ll be able to move on from it. and, obv, in a best case scenario you might even find out that they actually enjoyed the thread and want to play together again.

silently dropping a thread and hoping the other person will take a hint is kind of dumb imo, but it’ll always be a thing if everyone is always too nervous to send a pm and ask what’s up.