Skip to Main Content
hateboner (
hateboner
) wrote in
wankgate
2012
-
10
-
24
11:57 pm
The Fourteenth
LATEST PAGE
Game Hate
|
Canon Hate
|
Namedropping
|
Mods' Pet Peeves
|
Game Pet Peeves
|
Plurk Pet Peeves
|
Icon pet peeves
|
Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Re: Game Pet Peeves
(Anonymous)
2012-10-24 11:18 am (UTC)
(
link
)
-Journal based vs comm based: never saw the difference, just a matter of preference
-written history sections: agreed
-activity check requirements that have obvious loopholes: name ONE AC system that prevents squatting. I haven't seen it yet.
-rules like luceti's no webcomic rule: that was stupid since day one, it doesn't have anything to do with "out of date"
+100
(Anonymous)
2012-10-24 04:24 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
My friend is a notorious character squatter, has been for years. She manages to play at Aather
and
Thusia without getting kicked out.
Re: +100
(Anonymous)
2012-10-26 09:45 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
how in the
fuck
does she manage that
+1
(Anonymous)
2012-10-24 05:28 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
People who want to squat will find ways around the rule. There have been squatters in every single game I've ever played in and that's probably close to 20 by now.
2392 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
Re: Game Pet Peeves
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:18 am (UTC)(link)-written history sections: agreed
-activity check requirements that have obvious loopholes: name ONE AC system that prevents squatting. I haven't seen it yet.
-rules like luceti's no webcomic rule: that was stupid since day one, it doesn't have anything to do with "out of date"
+100
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 04:24 pm (UTC)(link)Re: +100
(Anonymous) 2012-10-26 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 05:28 pm (UTC)(link)