MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-12-15 12:23 am (UTC)(link)

(Anonymous) 2016-12-17 06:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Stop posting the Feeling Dominant meme. Nobody in DWRP ever feels dominant.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-17 06:16 pm (UTC)(link)
hope springs eternal i suppose

(Anonymous) 2016-12-17 06:36 pm (UTC)(link)
i feel dominant :(

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-17 18:42 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-12-18 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
more likely anyone who plays take charge characters knows better than to post to bakerstreet advertising it

(Anonymous) 2016-12-18 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
more like every time I post my dominant characters all I get are pillow kings/queens

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-12-19 06:57 pm (UTC)(link)
what's up with everybody just posting toplevels with no prompts and never tagging around? are people really that scared of approaching other rpers to discuss things, or are memes just not worth putting any effort into? i don't get it.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-12-19 07:02 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm not being sassy, i'm genuinely asking: are you new?

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-19 22:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-12-19 07:16 pm (UTC)(link)
unless the meme specifies it, nobody usually puts a prompt in their actual toplevel

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-12-19 07:58 pm (UTC)(link)
the two reasons that come to mind are one: the players are too lazy and think everyone should come tag them or two: no one wants to tag around because they think their starter won't be tagged back.

(Anonymous) 2016-12-19 08:14 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm just shy.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-12-19 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I tend to feel like no one actually wants cross-canon. Like everyone is waiting for canonmates. So I feel too awkward to tag outside of my own, mostly rare, canons. Maybe that's just me, though.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-19 23:43 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-20 00:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-20 00:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-20 10:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-20 18:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-21 22:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-21 23:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-22 01:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 10:52 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-12-21 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
if you're a slow tagger, then maybe you should focus on doing the threads you already started instead of letting those sit for like a fucking month while you go around leaving top comments all over the place.

better yet: if you have the brain power to answer to your recent threads, then maybe you could use it to answer the one you asked me to open last month.

or stop asking for threads that we both know you will ignore, period.

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-12-21 05:04 am (UTC)(link)

http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) 2016-12-22 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
Seen this meme pop up before, but it didn't get much liftoff then and probably won't this time either. It's like the OC-only meme. Or if somebody decides to post a meme for m/m only ("but of course not," we claim, "m/m is so common already".

Players might complain that there never is enough f/f going around, but if the entire basis of interactions between two characters is just that they are both girls/women into girls/women then maybe those characters weren't very well-developed or played well to begin with.

If anything, the presence of known weirdos like that Konoka is likely as much of a turnoff.

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) 2016-12-22 01:00 am (UTC)(link)
the last time this meme was posted, it got 700 some odd comments

sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-22 01:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-22 01:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-22 01:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-22 01:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-23 18:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-23 23:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-22 12:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) 2016-12-22 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
this is the "why isn't there a WHITE entertainment channel?" of meme bitching

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) 2016-12-22 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
lmao butthurt fujo who's upset there isn't a meme where icky vaginas aren't welcome detected

keep moving those goalposts, you'll prove to everyone that it's a bad meme sooner or later!

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-22 01:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-22 01:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-22 01:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-22 01:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-22 01:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) 2016-12-22 02:34 am (UTC)(link)
are you a new import from IJ or tumblr or something? Because we've always had shipping memes that cater to f/f or m/m, way back when memebells was a thing on LJ

god, you new kids are embarrassing

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-22 03:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-22 17:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-23 00:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-23 17:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-23 22:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3862756.html

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-24 02:33 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-24 05:27 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-12-24 05:22 am (UTC)(link)
When you're voicetesting a new muse and get tagged by their canon love interest... except the icons they kick things off with is a bad crop of (probably) NSFW fan art

Obviously tagging back, wish me luck

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 03:49 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 08:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 10:09 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 16:24 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 16:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 16:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 23:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-26 00:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 17:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 23:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 23:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 23:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-26 17:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-26 18:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-26 18:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-26 19:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-26 19:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-01-02 07:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-01-02 10:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-01-02 15:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-12-25 06:56 am (UTC)(link)
smut picture meme goes up. pretty sure 19 of those 51 top levels are the same person. i just don't see the point to musedumping. pick five or six. there is no way they can keep up with 19 threads if anyone tagged them all.

and since they play a character that got dropped here for their username and responded to it, i know they're reading this. you may not know this, but when you dump that many characters in a meme, it makes me and others like me less inclined to tag you because it looks like you give zero fucks about actually playing anything out and just want to top level. focus on the ones you're really in the mood to play and it comes off more like you're likely to follow through. you have characters i wouldn't mind trying to play with, but i'm not going to tag because i have a feeling you'll just phone them in.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 06:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 07:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 07:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 08:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 08:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 20:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 20:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 20:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-28 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 14:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-25 14:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-12-27 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
"oh, wow, i'm really enjoying this meme, it seems like a slow burner with more and more people commenting! i hope we keep seeing new characters over the next day or so. plus, the meme itself is one that hasn't been beat to death. it could just have legs for once."

>a texting meme buries it

"well that was nice while it lasted"

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-27 23:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-28 00:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-28 01:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-29 01:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-12-28 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
just out of curiosity, how many actual players are behind the sea of pretty white faces in the sexting meme?

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-28 00:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-28 22:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-29 01:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-12-29 04:34 am (UTC)(link)
just to make things real clear here

if you play an oc or a character that has zero info to be found on them via a google search, and you also have no bio, no profile, not even a sentence summarizing who the fuck your character is

don't be surprised when your top levels go untagged, and your tag-outs go ignored

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-29 04:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-29 04:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-29 04:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-29 05:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-29 04:50 (UTC) - Expand

OP

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-29 05:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-29 05:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2016-12-29 05:23 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2017-01-01 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-01-02 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
Just an FYI that Made By Me goes by the handle of Herc

his personal journal's profile has a muselist: [personal profile] white_tiger

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-01-02 02:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-01-02 03:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-01-02 03:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-01-05 00:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-01-03 21:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-01-04 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-01-04 01:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-01-05 03:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-01-04 08:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-01-05 00:56 (UTC) - Expand