ahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahhaha no. not even remotely. SU is far from perfect, but thinking its animation quality is uniquely shitty is remarkably stupid.
Obviously, anon. That's why I'm asking if it's a thing in the extra shit that DID get removed because if it is then whatever is happening between those characters would make more sense.
i think you're forgetting about incentive. he might have been an ass, but he didn't do anything that any of the other vampires in the game already haven't done.
Lord. As a white person playing through the Japanese release (fuck kanji, btw. Shit's hard to read), the rate people try to "educate" others on Japanese culture makes me want to slap a fuck.
so your problem is that you don't want someone in the game unless they are nice and sweet and fluffy with redeemable qualities? because tbh that gets boring. if you don't want to tag a character that you claim is EVIL, then don't? why drag them through wankgate's shit just because they aren't your cup of tea.
Wedge featured quite prominently in the EU, including some of the books generally considered to be among the best. So yes, he's definitely a character who makes sense to play if you go the Legends route.
No, Eudio has specific rules against characters like Jerry. There is no incentive in the world that could make him play nice. Unless they player intends to bend and twist him until he's a totally different character, he would agree to the rules just to get at that city of completely unsuspecting victims. To set up shop and slowly snack his way through the city.
There is a section of the app where you need to describe how well they fit the game, specifically in regards to consent. So the player will have to outright lie to make Jerry suitable.
This isn't about wanting sweet and fluffy characters. I love villains. I have many on my muselist. This isn't just because Jerry is "evil." It's that he is the epitome of what isn't allowed in Eudio. Like other anons have said: He revels in what he does. He locks people in rooms to savor their slow deaths. Just look at what he did to Amy.
off-topic, thanks for this! i didn't think to check anywhere for a full listing of thought bubbles. i play a few FFIV characters and this will be helpful.
on-topic, i play a few FFIV characters and i will maintain that Kain is an angsty, broody dipshit that needs at least a little in-game character development if he's going to be doing fluffy shippy things with someone. i have no investment in how good or bad the Kain we're bitching about is, but c'mon, canon is pretty clear.
is there a way to tell someone they literally gave you neither a hook nor a setting in their starter so you can't respond to it without coming off as a dickweed?
different anon but i disagree. there are plenty of incentives he could choose from to be appable in eudio. even the baddest baddies have things they want or are willing to play nice for. it's been a long time since i've seen it, but i could come up with a few reasons someone like jerry would agree to honor consent, whether he deep down wants to or not.
that doesn't mean he's going to suddenly be a good guy. or that he'll leave eudio as a better person, but to sit there and say that he can't be apped because he's done bad things and liked doing them isn't true. and this all sounds like you're one of those people that likes to generate wank in any way possible or that you're way too sensitive. maybe both. probably both.
You're not the one apping him with insight into how this person is going to play him. This is like arguing that chars like Kylo Ren can't be appable because he forcechoked Rey and killed his dad and wants to be evil. I'm sorry, but if people can app GoT characters that are actual rapists and come up with incentives, you can suck it up that Jerry from some vampire movie is apping.
I for one am now more excited to see what they do since you're being such a whiner about it. Is this grudgewank of some kind? Chill out.
people seem to conveniently forget that they're brought into the game with full clarification of being given an incentive that is enough of a reason for them to go along with the rules. they're told 'if you don't follow the rules, you will be sent back with no reward'.
it's a carrot on a stick. i don't understand why the people that whine the loudest on here seem to think that even rapey, killer characters aren't capable of basic understanding. do they understand consent? yes. do they normally live by it? no. will they to get whatever reward they're aiming for? possibly. and if not then they can get booted from the city/game.
eudio is a cuddlebox, not a safe space from problematic canons.
nightwing. 4 hours ago they just seem really sweet and genuine about not knowing they did something mean ;;
But the other person didn't do anything wrong.
I don't go here, but I think all the people scratching their heads going "why do you think you can police other people's canon choices?" have their answer right here.
Please continue welcoming all the babies, Eudio. May they all huddle here and stay out of other spaces.
Page 54 of 145