MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-01-31 08:55 pm (UTC)(link)

YOUR LEAST FAVORITE PREFS/PREFS THAT MAKE YOU NOPE OUT

(Anonymous) 2017-02-01 03:24 am (UTC)(link)
it was hilarious last time

(Anonymous) 2017-02-02 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)
[no crack] with a character that is fundamentally a crack character

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-02-01 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
why is taboo tuesday even a thing it barely gets any notes

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-02-01 03:46 pm (UTC)(link)
there's a few memes i see reposted that get zero hits every time they're up, yet they go up like clockwork.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-02-01 05:49 pm (UTC)(link)
> notes

I don't think it's gonna be a thing on tumblr either

+1

(Anonymous) 2017-02-05 07:17 am (UTC)(link)
dammit i laughed

ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) 2017-02-02 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
people who don't deserve full namedrops but really rustle your haunches when you see them/get tagged by them

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) 2017-02-02 03:42 pm (UTC)(link)
harley quinn

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-02 17:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) 2017-02-02 05:19 pm (UTC)(link)
that patchouli

+1

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-05 00:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-05 01:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-05 04:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) 2017-02-02 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)
who would have guessed that Radical Edward would grow from a weird, androgynous, dark-skinned teen into a gorgeous, super feminine white model in just a couple years.

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) 2017-02-03 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
kpop sirius black

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-03 04:03 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-03 05:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) 2017-02-03 04:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Pretty much anyone in bs who also xposts to tlh. I know I'm asking for it when I go fishing around smut threads with female chars from popular vg/manga but it still sucks to put one out there and get nothing but lasthungrywolf or pervykatsu or onewithwater.

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-03 17:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-03 20:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-03 18:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-03 19:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-03 20:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-03 21:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-03 22:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-03 21:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-03 21:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-03 21:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-03 23:56 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-09 05:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) 2017-02-05 02:34 am (UTC)(link)
that person (people?) who only uses their default icon and leaves a full space or more at the end of their tag. idk if they're using mobile or what, but that space at the end of every single tag annoys me way more than it probably should. i always drop their threads.

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-05 02:57 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-05 03:14 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-05 05:22 (UTC) - Expand

http://www.dreamwidth.org/support/faqbrowse?faqid=265

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-05 05:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) 2017-02-05 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
people who put ota in their header yet, in their preference posts, they only name canonmates in their acceptable column and make no mention of crosscanon being okay or not okay.

oprah_whatisthetruth.gif

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) 2017-02-06 07:18 pm (UTC)(link)
lighteningcount

granted idk if they even meme much anymore but god they were awful

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-06 19:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ANNOYING MEME-ers

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-07 01:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-02-04 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
disclaimer: I am not a wanker, a creep, a neckbeard, ESL, or playing an OC.

But ffs if you're not going to respond to any starters that get posted to you stop posting your characters to every meme ever.

This shit makes me not want to write starters for anyone, which is half the problem in bakerstreet as it is, so if you don't intend to respond to anyone who tags you because you want X specific thing with X specific character, how about you tag out instead and leave posting top levels to people who will tag strangers back?

signed,
Frustrated With This Fucking Hobby

+1

(Anonymous) 2017-02-05 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
Cosigned. This shit is fucking exhausting and adds to the cycle of burnout and to the issues BS is facing right now exactly.

+1

(Anonymous) 2017-02-05 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
it's at the point where I really only tag friends who I know are still down to play.

+1

(Anonymous) 2017-02-06 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
So much this. And half the time when you bring it up you get all these whiny brats being all "well I don't OWE anyone replies" as though that makes ignoring starters hunky dory behavior.

+1

(Anonymous) 2017-02-06 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
1000x worse if you play a character not from a popular canon because then the other person has to actually read up on your character

http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3966819.html

(Anonymous) 2017-02-09 11:33 am (UTC)(link)
i'm glad they addressed it, because i was getting tired of seeing double/triple copies of already scheduled memes being 'snuck through'. post them on your own meme comms if you want, but no need to crosspost them. just go to rpa and post a link to your meme comm, ffs.

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3966819.html

(Anonymous) 2017-02-09 11:36 am (UTC)(link)
i was actually curious: which ones are they talking about? i haven't been keeping a super close eye out so the copies of scheduled memes (?) apparently just flew right over my head. examples?

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/3966819.html

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-09 11:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-02-09 02:20 pm (UTC)(link)
( she's a loyal, patient, long-suffering "girl you've got back home" kinda dame, the one you can take home to mother and will be by your side through thick and thin. also, she's from the 1940s. pretty much. )

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2017-02-09 02:45 pm (UTC)(link)
how did she hurt you, anon

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-09 14:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-09 14:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-09 15:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-09 15:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-09 15:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-09 15:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-09 15:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-09 15:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-09 15:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-09 15:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-09 15:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-09 15:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-09 15:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-11 06:44 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-11 08:01 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2017-02-12 05:44 (UTC) - Expand