(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2017-05-06 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Christian Bale was expected to put on a hundred some pounds of muscles within a few months after nearly killing himself looking like a man that was almost dead from aids but Gal Gadot joins the tradition of Wonder Women that don't have to look the part physically

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2017-05-06 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
no yodie

bad yodie

(frozen comment)

(Anonymous) 2017-05-06 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
careful, anon, there's some wgers who think that if you dare suggest gal gadot doesn't look the part for wonder woman, you must be a sjw cuck who believes wondy should be fat.

i know this is copypasta but there are seriously idiots here who think that.






it's also crappypasta because iirc cbale was supposed to look like someone who was almost dead from lack of sleep, not aids.

(frozen comment) da +1

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 00:07 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da +1

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 00:20 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) da

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 00:12 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 00:26 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 00:36 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 00:56 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 03:47 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 04:39 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 04:52 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 01:28 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 01:30 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 01:50 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 01:54 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) ...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 02:00 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-05-07 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)
is there a way to hide someone's post in a community? i know you can hide comments on the posts themselves, but i don't want to look at this person's shit, period.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-07 06:01 pm (UTC)(link)
i don't think so, no. sorry anon!

(Anonymous) 2017-05-07 08:05 pm (UTC)(link)
is there any het couple tumblr/currently ~woke~ fandom place of your choice actually likes? not trying to turn this into a het uhpresshuns argument, as het is by the numbers more prevalent in dwrp than anything else, but i'm genuinely curious because Discourse usually seems to paint most m/f pairings that could probably be considered popular as abusive, heteronormative, too big of an age gap, imbalanced in power, or otherwise problematic

(Anonymous) 2017-05-07 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)
jake/amy

+1!

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 22:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1!

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 22:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1!

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 22:18 (UTC) - Expand

DA

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 15:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1!

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 22:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1!

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 14:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1!

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 15:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1!

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 17:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 17:23 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-05-07 08:57 pm (UTC)(link)
mickey and minnie.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-07 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)
i haven't got an example for you but this shit rankles me. i understand wanting more diversity in depictions of romance but shitting on any het couples just for being het doesn't help anyone. literally saw a tweet the other day saying THEY'RE BOTH BI SO IT'S NOT ~ACTUALLY~ AN ICKY HET SHIP!

sa

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 21:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 23:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 00:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 01:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 04:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 04:58 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-05-07 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Animorphs fandom is old but still active and Tobias/Rachel and Jake/Cassie have their followers. I haven't seen discourse about those ships at all really, lots of people seem to love R/T.

I personally don't like the ship, but a lot of people love Levi/Hange from Attack on Titan.

Ummmm and old again but Hiruma/Mamori (from Eyeshield 21) seems to be generally very well liked. The manga doesn't explicitly make them canon but it's pretty heavily implied, and I think the writer did a great job with the ship actually.

Young Wizards, Kit/Nita seems to be a popular and well-liked ship.

Some of these fandoms aren't very active, which maybe has something to do with it?

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 23:36 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-07 23:49 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-05-07 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
in one of my more obscure fandoms, one of the most often shipteased m/f pairings is generally popular and is tolerated even by the people who don't ship it, but there's a whole lot of people who pair the m half of it with another guy in the series that he never meets

(Anonymous) 2017-05-07 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Clarke/Bellamy from The 100 is probably just as popular as Clarke/Lexa, but the ship wars get pretty vicious.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 05:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:11 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-05-07 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
i've never seen het shat on just for being het

reylo gets wank, but for interfering with another het ship

but het isn't hated, tumblr is always trying to make their het seem the most woke because its woc/white man or they imagine they're both bi

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 00:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 00:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 00:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 00:51 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 08:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 11:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 11:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 02:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 02:57 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 05:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 01:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 01:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 01:18 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 01:22 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 02:46 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 04:58 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 11:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 01:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 02:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 00:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 04:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 00:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 00:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 01:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 01:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 02:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 00:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 01:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 14:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 02:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 02:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 10:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 10:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 10:56 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 11:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 11:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 13:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 14:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 15:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 15:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 15:21 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 15:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 15:23 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 15:27 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 15:28 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 15:33 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 16:19 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 16:46 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 17:20 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 22:53 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:27 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:32 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:42 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:44 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:46 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:50 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:56 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:58 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:06 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:08 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:08 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:12 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:21 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:40 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 05:52 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 06:10 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 06:20 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 06:22 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 06:49 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:10 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:13 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:17 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:19 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:21 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:22 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:24 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:26 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:28 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:30 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:31 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:34 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:39 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:40 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:42 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:33 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:38 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:49 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:52 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:24 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:36 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:01 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:34 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:42 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:59 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:01 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 06:40 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 14:17 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 03:50 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:25 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:45 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:58 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:02 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:15 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:08 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:23 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:27 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:37 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:53 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:09 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 15:53 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 16:01 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 16:07 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 03:23 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 03:28 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 07:26 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 17:10 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 17:14 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 17:27 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 17:51 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 18:01 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 17:24 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 17:40 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 17:42 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 18:02 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 18:37 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 19:45 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 20:40 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 20:44 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 21:00 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-11 00:19 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-11 12:22 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 22:33 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 22:33 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 22:44 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 22:47 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 17:49 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 17:57 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 19:48 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 20:20 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 19:54 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:19 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:28 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:29 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:30 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:32 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:44 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:46 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:05 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:33 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:10 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 09:01 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 11:51 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 12:23 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:24 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:26 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:41 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:11 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 07:46 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:02 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:03 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:04 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:06 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:07 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:09 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:10 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:15 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:25 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 05:53 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:07 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:14 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:13 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:41 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:44 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:50 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:43 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:47 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:49 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:22 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:40 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:43 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:51 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:52 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:53 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:56 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:58 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 22:51 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:08 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:19 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:12 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 03:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 17:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 17:17 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
I've only see the exact opposite, same sex ships with a conflicting element like age gap, abuse, etc, or even nothing really pressing like the former (they're rivals, they fought one time) get shit on way harder than any m/f couple who has the same things. I've never seen a het anti that didn't end up also being really homophobic and sexist in their own right, and generally see it get more of a pass across all fandom platforms.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 00:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 01:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 03:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 11:39 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 12:48 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 13:10 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 14:30 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 14:34 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 14:37 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 14:36 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 14:47 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 21:11 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 21:16 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 21:23 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 21:33 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 21:39 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 21:40 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 21:46 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 21:50 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 22:38 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 22:41 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 22:59 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:04 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:08 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:16 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 22:22 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 22:26 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:12 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 13:21 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 21:10 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 21:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 16:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 21:27 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 21:51 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:19 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 17:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 08:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 13:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 00:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 04:56 (UTC) - Expand

_

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 13:36 (UTC) - Expand

sa

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 13:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 21:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 22:10 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
well when bleach ended the ichiruki vs ichihime argument was BIG

also i'd say disney princesses with their princes are usually pretty safe.

sakura/shaoran from card captor sakura

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
lucifer/chloe from the lucifer series is pretty much liked by fandom, cast, and anyone associated with the show. and lucifer is canon bi.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
this place is so homophobic i s2g

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 02:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 05:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 11:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 12:49 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 14:30 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 05:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 14:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 04:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 06:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 09:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 10:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 11:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 08:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 15:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 20:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 20:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 20:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 21:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 22:44 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:28 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:31 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:38 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:40 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 19:23 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 20:39 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 19:28 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 21:06 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 04:59 am (UTC)(link)
Han/Leia
Finn/Rey
Ichiruki
Reinhardt/Ana
Shallura
Gansey/Blue
Gray Man/Maura
Tony/Pepper
Steve/Peggy
Clint/Natasha (who hate hard on Bruce/Natasha so that's het infighting tbf)
Frank/Karen
EVERY. DISNEY. SHIP.

And easily a hundred more sacred good unproblematic (tm) ships that all contain things that fandom has torn apart m/m and f/f ships over. Don't worry, the hets are still in control and if you don't ship this het couple it's because you hate women and don't want to see them empowered, especially if you prefer a f/f ship.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 08:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 08:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 11:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 14:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 11:43 (UTC) - Expand

sa

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 11:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 11:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 11:57 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 18:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 12:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 14:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 16:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 17:11 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 05:12 am (UTC)(link)
old but hiruma/mamori

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 06:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 05:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 05:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 08:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 08:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 14:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 15:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 18:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 20:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 16:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 22:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 18:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 18:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 18:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 18:22 (UTC) - Expand

sa

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 18:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 18:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 18:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 18:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 18:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:15 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:22 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 03:04 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 03:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 01:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 18:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 23:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 00:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 05:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 02:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 03:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 12:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 21:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 21:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 21:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 20:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 20:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 20:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 20:23 (UTC) - Expand

+100000

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-11 00:21 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
this might be the wrong place but whatever

it's fucking infuriating seeing someone who's your age and has zero responsibilities. pretends to be her mom's caretaker but her mom does the cleaning and cooking and can drive/go out on her own without any assistance, so I call bullshit on her acting like she has such a hard job taking care of her. gets mom's social security checks to spend 50-100 dollars on make up weekly, plus other fun things because she has no fucking bills whatsoever. never had to have a real job, doesn't have to pay rent, just gets to sit on her ass and watch movies, buy make up, and then has the audacity to complain about her dad asking her to help around the house more. bonus she's an only child and only grandchild, and both her mom and grandma still coddle the shit out of her despite the fact she's twenty-one years old. and then people wonder why she's a toxic piece of shit.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-08 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
adding to this someone who is on fucking assistance but makes her real money by joining as many games as she can and scamming people for small amounts of cash by whining that she needs money here's an idea. get. a. fucking. job. or you know bitch don't buy fucking games off steam all the time and then whine when you have no money left to buy food

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-08 22:34 (UTC) - Expand

DA

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 01:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 19:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 07:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 20:17 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 06:28 am (UTC)(link)
i come here to talk about shitty RP, not gender wank. tell me about your least favorite version of a character, they don't need to be playing in your game or any game anymore, but what you've seen you hate.

(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 06:56 am (UTC)(link)
gonsai's and prof's touhous

all horribly flat and interchangeable so the only thing setting them apart is the things they talk about uninterestingly, ie. themselves
the immortal keeps going on and on about how she can't die, every conversation with the semi-deified shrine maiden becomes "oh you know i'm a god," blah blah blah

it's all the more ironic given the beef between gonsai and prof too

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 07:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 07:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 07:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 07:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 09:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 10:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 10:25 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 17:14 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 01:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 12:21 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 16:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 16:51 (UTC) - Expand

+999999

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 03:47 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 03:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 04:49 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 05:04 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 13:40 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-12 10:10 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 07:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 04:01 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 02:13 pm (UTC)(link)
imagine you're playing a character in game that never had any romantic subplot in canon. they get in a het ship. but then more episodes/sequel/whatever comes out and they're shown to be gay.

what would you do? do you think this is the only exception where making a gay character bi (in game at least) would be ok?

(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 02:16 pm (UTC)(link)
if you took them from a point that was pre-specified, no one can give you shit for not following canon. i'd say it's just a matter of following what you were given. not all characters are stereotypes of gay/lesbian caricatures. you did the best you could. you got in a ship in game. you weren't doing it to stick it to the man. you're good.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 16:07 (UTC) - Expand

op

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 16:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 17:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 17:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 19:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 00:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 01:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 03:25 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 05:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Anons, I have the urge to play a certain character, but I'm worried about attracting castmates. Specifically, I'm worried about people wanting to play someone that was strongly attached to this character until their death. I want to play the character moving on from this. It's a reasonably old series so there aren't a lot of people that play from it, but it was popular enough that seeing me play this character might encourage someone to drag out an old muse.

It would be completely OOC for my character not to immediately attach themself to their deceased friend, but I would rather explore their life beyond them. There's also the matter of that castmate inevitably dropping once the initial thrill wears off which will then be tough for my character to deal with. Again.

Is it crappy RPing to include a note in my journal discouraging this? Should I avoid playing the character if I'm really worried about it?

(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)
yes

if you have any creativity, you'll know how to balance both. sure, the character is there, but the death doesn't suddenly stop being real. your character still has to deal with those memories. maybe something interesting would come of that. don't discourage people from playing characters they want to play because you can't think your way through that possible situation.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 19:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 20:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 21:01 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)
here comes the players who are going to put in a hiatus at their games to join a murder game.

what's the point of taking a hiatus if you weren't active in your original games to begin with?

(Anonymous) 2017-05-09 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Keep fucking that chicken.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 22:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 23:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 23:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 23:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-09 23:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 16:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-10 22:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-11 00:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-11 00:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-11 01:45 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-11 03:20 (UTC) - Expand

...

(Anonymous) - 2017-05-12 02:29 (UTC) - Expand

Page 4 of 4

<< [1] [2] [3] [4] >>