(Anonymous) 2017-07-09 02:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Pitch perfect 3 looks terrible

(Anonymous) 2017-07-09 02:55 pm (UTC)(link)
they were all terrible.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-09 18:10 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-07-12 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
it was a shitshow behind the scenes, that probably explains a lot

/source: relative working on the crew

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-12 00:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 08:04 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-07-10 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
sometimes i wonder what renne's gotten up to

shine on, you crazy monkeydoghorsething

(Anonymous) 2017-07-10 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)
probably galloping across the ruins of whatever mush/muds remain out there, or whatever chatroom will accept their insane backstory.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-10 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I live for the day I might be able to reach the status of a "That [instert character here]"

Alas, it hasn't happened yet.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-11 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
you're not being shit enough

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-11 06:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-11 06:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-11 10:58 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-07-11 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
Every dear player post that starts with "don't you have anything better to do"

stop this

(Anonymous) 2017-07-11 06:55 am (UTC)(link)
well they don't lbr

they're posting to d_p

(Anonymous) 2017-07-12 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
don't you have anything better to do?

(Anonymous) 2017-07-13 09:20 am (UTC)(link)
only acceptable if it's coming from a flowey tbh

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 15:34 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-07-11 05:38 pm (UTC)(link)
What do you consider to be the cutoff for reapplying to a game? There's one that I used to play in on and off a year ago and the year before that, but I kept choosing really unfitting characters that didn't work well with the setting so I ended up idling out from a combination of that and RL issues. I still really like the concept and I'd like to give it a third try, but would that be too much?

(Anonymous) 2017-07-11 05:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Nah, it wouldn't be too much imo. Your former CR might be wary but there's probably been a lot of player turnover in the last year.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-11 06:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Speaking as a former mod, I wouldn't really do anything about someone who idled out once, especially if it was a year ago. I might ask them to wait a round if they immediately tried to re-app right after idling, but beyond that wouldn't be too concerned. Idling sucks but I know it sometimes just comes down to losing track of time, or RL issues meaning that filling out a drop form for an online RP game isn't a priority.

If you idled out two times or more I'd app anyways but be prepared for them to potentially confront you about it. Idling once is a mistake, idling 2+ times is where I start to think it's a habit. While I wouldn't personally reject based on that I would likely give a final 'if you idle again you will not be allowed to re-apply' warning. If it's been a year and you had a year in between your first and second time in game they might not even remember you though.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-11 06:53 pm (UTC)(link)
the cut-off date is whenever you get sick of this song and dance. old cr may be wary, but if it's been that long than there should be plenty of newer players who don't know about you or your previous characters. if you focus on reaching out to newbies and other unfamiliar faces, then you should be fine.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-12 07:55 am (UTC)(link)
Icon makers, if another player requested icons from you for a character you already play, would you refuse to make them on the grounds that you would have to use your own caps and you don't want to make any duplicates that look like the ones you use for your journal? Is that a seriously a reasonable issue or am I justified in thinking that's a little weird?

(Anonymous) 2017-07-12 08:19 am (UTC)(link)
for me personally? it seems stupid. you're playing the same character. they're going to 'look the same' regardless of what caps/icons you use. i'd just let them pick from the icons i've already made, tbh. in fact, that's what i've done in the past. i find it highly unlikely they'd crop the exact same doing another set from the same caps, and even if you gave them your own caps, i find it equally unlikely that your caps would magically be drastically different enough that your icons wouldn't look similar, regardless of who made them. it's the same character, ffs.

sounds highlandery to me on a character standpoint, let alone as an icon maker.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-12 08:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-12 12:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-12 12:26 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-12 12:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 03:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 16:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 16:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 08:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 10:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-12 15:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-12 23:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 07:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 02:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 16:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 19:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 20:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 00:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 00:45 (UTC) - Expand

WORST CASES OF HIGHLANDERING

(Anonymous) 2017-07-13 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
Give me your cringiest stories.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-13 02:51 am (UTC)(link)
This was years ago. I was in a game with a pretty well established Dean Winchester, who had been around for about a year and a half, two years, when a group of cliquey girls who played buffy the vampire slayer characters came in. The Faith player was dead-set on shipping with Dean, whose player had already been working on getting a ship going with another character. This Faith-mun, pissed at being jilted, had someone from the group of BTVS players app in another Dean, as this game allowed 2 versions of the same character. This Dean and the Faith had a horrible shippy grossness. Like, horribly OOC on both their ends, being super schmoopy over the whole thing. Calling each other honeybunches and snuggle bear. Yeah. Unironically.

Now mind, Dean 1 was in the fast-paced game daily for nearly two years by this point, and had a lot of character development. He didn't want to do any more Hunting shit. He was happy to settle down and do the family with the picket fence and nicely manicured lawn thing, after all the bullshit he was put through in canon. This made Dean 2's mun flip absolute shit, and start nitpicking every goddamn thing Dean 1 did, OOC and IC. Being PA as shit.

Finally, Faith-mun got pissed enough where she went nuclear. Dean 2 was obviously not pushing hard enough and being passive aggressive enough for Dean 1 to give up playing in the game. So she flipped absolute shit, accused the whole game (outside of the Buffy Clique) of favoritism, and were "brainwashed" by Dean 1's mun into liking that Dean better. She and her clique flounced for a "hiatus" for about two weeks.

Stuff died down. Things were nice.

Then someone apped in another Faith.

Oh, Faith-mun FLIPPED HER SHIT. She came off hiatus, screaming about how her Faith was the only Faith worthy of being in the game, and that no other Faith was as canon-faithful, and that this was obviously in retaliation for the whole Dean thing.

This Faith was a new player.

She attacked the player, ran the player off, and then started shit in the OOC community with the mods, who promptly banned her. They couldn't deal with the dumb bullshit anymore.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 02:55 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 09:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 20:36 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 21:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 23:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

op

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 01:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 00:49 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 01:45 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-07-13 04:19 am (UTC)(link)
Remember that time bsck in LJ when some Sonic or Pokemon players brought their rape plot to dear_mun, including a post where the rapist made a post literally saying "Yeah, I raped her. So what?"

Shit used to be wild, man.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-13 05:20 am (UTC)(link)
i was just reading old lj dear mun threads and one of the sonic ocs had tagged mine. it was one of the edgelord grimdark ones.

i made one obligatory reply and never replied back after that. yikes.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 09:29 (UTC) - Expand

Hedgehog Booty

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 13:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Hedgehog Booty

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 16:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Hedgehog Booty

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 22:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 15:31 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 16:39 (UTC) - Expand

WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) 2017-07-13 03:52 pm (UTC)(link)
characters being used as mouthpieces for their players. passive aggressive posts about rejections. awkward public pep talks about the player's mental health. hetalia rp based on real life tragedy. tell us the worst posts and threads you've seen here.

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) 2017-07-13 05:26 pm (UTC)(link)
duke "tree fucker" devlin posting to dear mun was great.

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 18:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 02:58 (UTC) - Expand

http://no-apologies.dreamwidth.org/18750.html

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 03:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://no-apologies.dreamwidth.org/18750.html

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 05:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://no-apologies.dreamwidth.org/18750.html

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 05:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://no-apologies.dreamwidth.org/18750.html

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 09:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://no-apologies.dreamwidth.org/18750.html

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 10:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://no-apologies.dreamwidth.org/18750.html

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 21:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://no-apologies.dreamwidth.org/18750.html

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 02:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://no-apologies.dreamwidth.org/18750.html

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 02:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: http://no-apologies.dreamwidth.org/18750.html

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 02:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 06:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 19:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 19:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 19:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 19:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 15:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 15:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 15:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 02:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 02:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 15:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 21:37 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-13 21:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 00:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 18:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 19:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 15:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 15:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 23:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 00:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 01:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 01:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 01:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 00:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 03:46 (UTC) - Expand

sa

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 03:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 03:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 06:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: WORST OF DEAR PLAYER/DEAR MUN

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-16 04:00 (UTC) - Expand

Teen Wolf

(Anonymous) 2017-07-14 07:47 am (UTC)(link)
I haven't been in this fandom in years now, but I've noticed (dormant) fans of the show go nuts on my dash over the new trailer?

Something about Jackson with that werewolf twin from s3 and Derek finally returning to the show? How are the Sterekers and others taking it?

I heard the Stile and Derek scenes were just added to the trailer to get views, but I'm really far behind on the TW fandom wank.

misfired Oops

(Anonymous) 2017-07-14 07:48 am (UTC)(link)
Fuck.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-14 04:04 pm (UTC)(link)
what if shocksock threw a bitchfit to be allowed to post TFLN and then doesn't do it

they're one of those autists that irrationally hates TFLN and it was all part of a cunning scheme to prevent people from playing in it

(Anonymous) 2017-07-14 04:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I would love that.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 17:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 17:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 17:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] shocksock - 2017-07-14 17:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 19:52 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 20:50 (UTC) - Expand

"da"

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 20:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 19:59 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) (no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 22:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 22:07 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 22:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-14 22:32 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-07-15 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
I'm glad I found someone to play against who isn't a fantastic writer so I don't really have to try. Even if I end up sending a tag I'm not proud of, it always ends up being on par with what they send. A lot less stressful IMO.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-15 02:23 am (UTC)(link)
and countdown to everyone getting paranoid and thinking this is their meme/psl partner in 3, 2, 1

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 03:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 03:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 04:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 05:31 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2017-07-15 05:30 am (UTC)(link)
what was your favorite story on bad rpers suck?

(Anonymous) 2017-07-15 06:08 am (UTC)(link)
This woman, this mod, this writer, is one of the most fair, most gracious of people. Her standards are very, very high. Any mod, running a game, has not only the right, but the responsibility, to clearly define their goals, rules, standards and requirements, and she does. Anyone who doesn't understand that or agree with it is free to go elsewhere.

That's the fact for ALL mods, in ALL games. She is just brutally open and honest about it.

I have been one of the "privilidged few", who was able to bring in new pups with a click and no app. It doesn't mean that she wasn't going to tell me if that muse was badly created, played or developed. If anything, to be in the "elite", you were subject to even more expectations to play at top form.

This woman, this writer, gave me her trust. And one morning, before dawn, in a fit of poor judgment and stupidity, I capped off months of stress by violating a sacred rule within the community. I didn't mean to. In fact, the post I made was not directed at any of the people inside the community. But it was stupid. It was wanky. It was thoughtless. And I took the wrath, full blast, online and by phone, from her. I owned it. I left the comm, because I had broken the rules, and being her friend didn't shelter me from that. I was out, and that is that. No favorites. No excuses. No way.

So you can say that this mod is tough. But the success of her community, and the absence of drama there speaks to the fact that she, and her fellow mods, run it fairly and with high standards. You can say what you want, but she is a great mod of a great community. She is also a great lady, and a great writer, friend and player. There are many players, who can't agree on anything else, who can attest to that.

And to her, I say this...

You are the very best. That's all.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 12:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 14:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 17:03 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) WHERE ARE THEY NOW? WANKER(S) EDITION.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-15 03:53 pm (UTC)(link)
so where are some of these wankers now a days? and what characters do they play?

(frozen comment) Re: WHERE ARE THEY NOW? WANKER(S) EDITION.

(Anonymous) 2017-07-15 04:01 pm (UTC)(link)
What part of "no fishing for wank" do you people not understand?

(frozen comment) Re: WHERE ARE THEY NOW? WANKER(S) EDITION.

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 16:27 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: WHERE ARE THEY NOW? WANKER(S) EDITION.

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 17:32 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: WHERE ARE THEY NOW? WANKER(S) EDITION.

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 17:34 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: WHERE ARE THEY NOW? WANKER(S) EDITION.

(Anonymous) - 2017-07-15 17:36 (UTC) - Expand

Page 3 of 3

<< [1] [2] [3] >>