hateboner (
hateboner
) wrote in
wankgate
2013
-
04
-
05
05:18 pm
The Fifty-Third
LATEST PAGE
Game Hate
|
Canon Hate
|
Namedropping
|
Mods' Pet Peeves
|
Game Pet Peeves
|
Plurk Pet Peeves
|
Icon pet peeves
|
Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous)
2013-04-11 09:52 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Watching people argue over putting a content warning about something that is already in the opening plurk.
(CW: X) Plurk about X
is just plain silly.
Oh hey, better take it a step further just in case. how about
(CW: x) Plurk about X. May contain references to X.
no subject
(Anonymous)
2013-04-12 03:12 am (UTC)
(
link
)
truth.
it's not rocket science to realize that if they're talking about x in the subject, then there are probably references to it in the plurk and link and just mute it.
4040 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)(CW: X) Plurk about X
is just plain silly.
Oh hey, better take it a step further just in case. how about
(CW: x) Plurk about X. May contain references to X.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 03:12 am (UTC)(link)it's not rocket science to realize that if they're talking about x in the subject, then there are probably references to it in the plurk and link and just mute it.