+1

(Anonymous) 2013-04-14 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
It would be meaningful if he accepted "I'm a rapist" instead of tapdancing around it with "what she experienced was undoubtedly rape."

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2013-04-14 04:57 am (UTC)(link)
where do you draw the line between "i am a rapist" and "i was a rapist"

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2013-04-14 04:59 am (UTC)(link)
What does this comment even mean?? If you committed rape, you are a rapist. Where does 'was' come into play? Are you trying to say that if you are not presently committing rape right at that very moment, you're only a rapist in the past tense...? That makes no fucking sense.

Once a rapist, forever a rapist.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2013-04-14 05:01 am (UTC)(link)
if you say i am a rapist, then yes, that does make it sound like you're still out there actively doing it

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2013-04-14 04:59 am (UTC)(link)
He didn't say "I was a rapist" either, you stupid shit. I'm pointing out the way he uses weasel words to make himself sound better.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2013-04-14 05:03 am (UTC)(link)
this is more of a general question you dumb bitch

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2013-04-14 05:00 am (UTC)(link)
both of those are not "what she experienced was undoubtedly rape"