Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
That person said good morning at 9:00 am. You don't need to reply to that plurk eight hours later at 5:00 pm!

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2013-09-09 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
is it your plurk? if so, then make it clear that you have a time limit on responses to it.

otherwise, just mute and move on. isn't it the point of plurk that people with different schedules or timezones can reply whenever they are able to? maybe this person just got up or got home from work or school and didn't see the plurk sooner?

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2013-09-09 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
sounds like someone's buttmad that a plurk they considered 'done' was pinged again later by someone who didn't see it until then. probably not their own or they would have said so. basically, your usual entitled asshole being an entitled asshole.

OP

(Anonymous) 2013-09-09 06:16 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not entitled, I just think it's really annoying, especially when the person who posted that plurk has posted "good afternoon!" and "good evening!" plurks since then! I don't get why they don't reply to those instead...

(Anonymous) 2013-09-10 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
"It annoys me, therefore you should not do it."

Yeah, that's being entitled.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2013-09-09 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
I wish someone loved me enough to do this.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2013-09-16 05:39 am (UTC)(link)
shut the fuck up and maybe someone will