I enjoy live action stuff and I don't mind threading against those muses. I just don't have any of my own.
The point I'm trying to make is that it seems like a pointless rule. It doesn't serve any purpose at all other than to alienate potential players and invite more elitism that we could really stand to do without.
Did the nasty animu kill your dog or something? You can call me butthurt if you want but all this baseless vitriol and people getting up-in-arms that medium divides are a great thing and that more games should have them is really disturbing, even for wankgate.
Sorry, nonny. You are not entitled to be able to play every game you want to. If people want to run a game with specific rules, they can, and tantrum isn't going to change that. The fact that you idiots are trying to wank it into oblivion is just pathetic.
Or you're just lazy and can't be assed to present a reasonable argument that doesn't involve spewing verbal diarrhea everywhere about how terrible anime is and how it's apparently impossible to scroll and ignore what we don't like.
Great job, slick, you totally have everyone convinced of your inherent superiority. I'll go crawl away to my corner of shame now.
Or I just don't enjoy anime and don't want to play with it. But way to go frothing at the mouth because our opinions differ. It isn't like there's a shortage of games that take anime characters or even games that only take anime characters.
It means I'm the same anon as the different anon that posted Wow. Just Wow. After I took a moment from my disgust to process a more coherent reply, champ.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 01:14 am (UTC)(link)The point I'm trying to make is that it seems like a pointless rule. It doesn't serve any purpose at all other than to alienate potential players and invite more elitism that we could really stand to do without.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 01:18 am (UTC)(link)I'm not sold on the concept since they don't allow canon ships (wut?) but I hope more games have the balls to ban animu in the future.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 01:19 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 01:26 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 01:38 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 01:21 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 01:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 01:27 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 01:31 am (UTC)(link)da
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 03:35 am (UTC)(link)I'm not interested either way, especially with such a BS rules (And I only play LA) but come on. it's a pretty unique concept.
nayrt
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 10:53 am (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2013-09-13 08:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 01:29 am (UTC)(link)Great job, slick, you totally have everyone convinced of your inherent superiority. I'll go crawl away to my corner of shame now.
da
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 01:33 am (UTC)(link)SA
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 01:35 am (UTC)(link)Re: SA
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 05:51 am (UTC)(link)Re: SA
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 10:54 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 10:58 am (UTC)(link)Re: SA
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 11:26 am (UTC)(link)ayrt - "anon you replied to" - is when you're conversing with another anon and want to make it clear that you're the same one as before
so yeah, you used the wrong one
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 12:17 pm (UTC)(link)from a cruel angel
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-12 04:28 pm (UTC)(link)