Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm surprised more people aren't throwing a fit about "But Genji is Japanese omg cultural eracure. He shouldn't be giving ANYONE chocolates, only getting them!! He should wait a month and give White Day gifts like they do in Glorious Nippon!!!"

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
It's an ugly, useless word said by an ugly, useless person.

The end.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
backpedal faster, op

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm a fucking moron and only saved the bib from my initial presentation write-up, the rest is on a gdrive of an e-mail account i no longer have access to BUT it's a good place to start, at least:

International Business, Times. "EA Blasted By Anti-Gay Activists: 'Mass Effect 3' And Top 5 LGBT Video Game Characters." International Business Times May 0004: Regional Business News. Web. 23 Nov. 2013.

International Business, Times. "5 Examples Of Gay Marriage In Video Games [VIDEO]." International Business Times 27 June 2013: Regional Business News. Web. 23 Nov. 2013.

Vargas, Jose Antonio. "Coming Out Of The Virtual Closet." Advocate 978 (2007): 62. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 23 Nov. 2013.

Ochalla, Bryan. "Queers In Queerland." Advocate 985 (2007): 18. Academic Search Complete. Web. 23 Nov. 2013.

Sliwinski, Alexander. "First-ever survey of gay videogamers." Washington Blade June 2007: Academic Search Complete. Web. 23 Nov. 2013.

in addition to these, i've just watched hundreds of hours on youtube of playthroughs of games with gay characters, panels at gaymerx and other LGBT-friendly conventions, and all that. a lot of those "top X" lists are just jumping off points you can use to find other examples.

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
?

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
okei

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:19 pm (UTC)(link)
this is awesome, thank you!

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:21 pm (UTC)(link)
da

this sounds interesting! thanks anon, i'll check these out.

OFFICIAL OVERWATCH PORN SEARCH RANKINGS

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
http://www.unilad.co.uk/gaming/pornhub-ranks-overwatch-characters-by-their-search-frequency/

reply if you were one of the 197 who searched Bastion

Re: KILLING STALKING

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)
... I don't even read manga and you made this sound really interesting and potentially awesome.

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)
tbh the real tragedy is that genyatta is being sunk. that was a nice ship.

Re: KILLING STALKING

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Also funny coming from Tumblr, the ground zero for romanticizing/shipping cannibal serial killers?

Ok.

Re: OFFICIAL OVERWATCH PORN SEARCH RANKINGS

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:25 pm (UTC)(link)
i came across this sfm that was widowtracer and i think it was futa but you couldn't really see, widow was fucking tracer while she was firing her rifle and i thought it was really hot.

the one time i was remotely interested in widowtracer.

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)
ryan gosling won a golden globe on sunday for la la land

Re: http://dear-player.dreamwidth.org/3349191.html#comments

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
jeje

HYPOTHETICAL RP SITUATIONS

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
for funsies.

Re: RYSLIG

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Well at least that's IC of it.

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)
oh is this one of those things that happens off the internet? sry i've been too busy informing people of how their wrong lately

Re: HYPOTHETICAL RP SITUATIONS

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)
a situation in which i actually manage to finish a thread

Re: HYPOTHETICAL RP SITUATIONS

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)
you're openly open to smut, even the kinky kind.

"amy" asks you if you'd be willing to play out something that's controversial such as bestiality, lolicon/shotacon, non-con, vanilla sex in the missionary position with the lights off, whatever.

situation A: you say sure, you're open to it or sure, you'll try it out. you don't show any obvious signs of being into it or against it.

situation B: you say sure, you're secretly into that gross shit.

amy then tries to paint you as a sick fuck either on anoncomms or in your friend group.

what do you do?

alternate situation: same situation, complete with A and B options, but you're not openly into smut and you use alts/socks to post on the kink threads in anon comms. so A outed you as a smut player AND someone who's open to controversial smut. same question, what do you do?

Re: OVERWATCH

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
nice list

it's been criticized and debunked left and right for including characters that weren't actually LGBT

+1

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)
sigh

Re: HYPOTHETICAL RP SITUATIONS

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
don't give a shit either way but dumping Amy's ass because no way am I sticking around someone like that

Re: HYPOTHETICAL RP SITUATIONS

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, seriously, who gives a shit? this is clearly "amy"'s problem. dump her, move on, enjoy your smut.

AYRT

(Anonymous) 2017-01-10 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, i got the impression the protagonists were supposed to be unsympathetic too. my problem is the author's done such a good job of creating a pair of deeply disturbed monomaniacs i don't feel all that bothered about what happens to either of them, and if i'm not interested in the characters i know i won't get on with a story. i had the same problem with a novel a few years back - the author had written such a convincing bunch of egocentric, self-deluding, narrow-minded asshole characters that i didn't want to spend much time around them because seriously you are all annoying as fuck, go away. which is a shame, because i find the premise of stalking killing absolutely fascinating. it's not so fascinating as to make me want to spend 13 chapters plus around a pair of characters i think are both irritating bastards, though.