Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 06:41 am (UTC)(link)
hey anon, when a sister in a show says "ugh, i'm gonna kill my brother!" when they do something annoying, are you expecting the show to suddenly turn into a murder thriller because you interpret all comments like that as 100% literal?

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 06:45 am (UTC)(link)
Most of us outgrew that kind of edgy hyperbolic violence when we were about 23 or so. We have this conversation all the time, anon. Half of us still like that humor, and the other half wants the first half to grow the fuck up.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 06:46 am (UTC)(link)
If you can't see why making comments like you're a rabid dog because some one asked you not to tag them is deranged you're probably just as bad.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 06:51 am (UTC)(link)
it wasn't because someone asked them not to tag them.

are you familiar with the phrase "the straw the breaks the camel's back" or do you take that shit literally, too?

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 06:53 am (UTC)(link)
love how you went from it being valid to have interpreted that as an actual threat to just saying it was immature the moment someone pointed out how stupid it is to take it so seriously.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 06:53 am (UTC)(link)
nobody is taking it literally

the problem is that until we see a pastebin, we only have bee's comment to go off

and they sound deranged on that comment, so from the little clues that we have, it sounds like they threw a fit because someone asked them not to tag them and they're blaming it on rl stress

it's what the "comic hyperbole" represents: a whiny baby ranting because they weren't told not to tag a log. that comic hyperbole is still a stupid reaction to have to such a request

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 06:54 am (UTC)(link)
"nobody is taking it literally"

except the people in rpanons, dave's player included, acting like it was somehow a valid threat.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 06:55 am (UTC)(link)
being asked not to tag a log shouldn't have been a straw at all

if you're in such rl stress that any little thing in rp may set (general) you off then you need a break

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 06:55 am (UTC)(link)
She's a total nobody but Fellden mods had grudgeboner against her. One so big they reported her to mods of other games.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 06:55 am (UTC)(link)
"someone made a hyperbolic statement not meant to be taken seriously while stressed. clearly they're deranged"

just admit you too something seriously that wasn't meant to be taken seriously.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 06:56 am (UTC)(link)
because the original anon described it as a threat. dave-player shouldn't have believed them, i agree there, but the only anon making it violent is the original on rpa

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 06:58 am (UTC)(link)
they're clearly deranged because they showed to be deranged on the rpa comment but keep fucking that chicken

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 07:06 am (UTC)(link)
it's

a turn of phrase

it's literally a way of saying "i'm so pissed i'm going to snap at the next person who pushes me"

it's a sign that they need to log the fuck off but it isn't weird

you can't be this dumb

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 07:13 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think anyone is actually worried about Bee biting actual fingers off but the point is that its an ugly response and a bad sign for anyone else who wants to assert a boundary.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 07:14 am (UTC)(link)
"from the little clues that we have, it sounds like they threw a fit because someone asked them not to tag them"

except the little clues that we have are bee saying that the vent plurk wasn't about rp, they just threw in the stupid megan drama as part of it because they considered the response they got outside basic human courtesy or w/e the wording they used was. the finger thing was 'i had this shitty interaction [on top of everything else] and if someone else interacts shittily with me right now i'm going to have words about it'

the tantrum didn't start over rp or not being told to tag the log, it was just another part for them to fling shit about while already in a mood and venting about unrelated things that should have been handled by not being on plurk dot com in the first place

like it still shows that bee sucks ass at handling their emotions like an adult, but 'they threw a fit because someone asked them not to tag them' is removing a bit of context. they threw a fit because they can't vent anywhere more productive and made the poor decision to be unhinged about unimportant non-drama as well

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 07:15 am (UTC)(link)
uggos + it's rebuttle

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 07:16 am (UTC)(link)
it's not the idiom itself that is weird, what is weird is that "i'm so pissed i'm going to snap" was a reaction had to a boundary

you are the dumb one

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 07:16 am (UTC)(link)
Because she included the RP drama i think its fair for people to be concerned she'd do the same to others considering her life is always stress and she has half the game blocked

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 07:21 am (UTC)(link)
>the finger thing was 'i had this shitty interaction [on top of everything else]

but it wasn't a shitty interaction

someone that THEY removed/blocked in the first place just politely told them "no thanks"

like i told the other anon, it shouldn't be a "last straw" in the first place. the vent plurk wasn't ONLY about rp, but rp was there and they did rant about it. so yes, they complained about being told not to tag a log. just because it wasn't the only topic it doesn't make it any less true

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 07:33 am (UTC)(link)
raise your hand if you have ever been randomly blocked by bee

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 07:40 am (UTC)(link)
i'm fucking flabbergasted by the anons who think bee did nothing wrong. like ignore the finger thing and the tl;dr she posted about her personal life, since that's irrelevant.

if i posted up a birthday log for my closest cr, and someone who has that close cr blocked on plurk tagged into it, i'd be uncomfortable too. that's weird, and not something i want to deal with in a fun log i posted for that close cr.

and since i posted the log, of course i'm going to be the one to tell the player not to tag into it. if the blocked player did it, it would seem like they're trying to gatekeep cr, on top of violating the implied "don't talk to me" that comes with blocking someone.

the childish and passive aggressive response would have been to ignore or delete the tag without saying anything. but they pmed them and asked them to delete their own tag instead. that's communication. so how the fuck is that an issue?

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 08:12 am (UTC)(link)
love to read all the unhinged takes on being cut and blocked on Plurk on RPA from the same anons that always bleat about "curating your own space"

the anons claiming you can't tag someone if you removed them from Plurk are particularly dumb

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 09:03 am (UTC)(link)
what even is this bee person's plurk handle?

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 09:25 am (UTC)(link)
anyone else side eye players who play literally every single character from a certain canon at once

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2022-04-10 09:49 am (UTC)(link)
you'll never catch me if i keep moving my goalposts!!!