"in the response to that "i'm not OP" statement, someone treats not-OP like they were OP."
no, in response to the anon claiming not to be op, i explicitly said i was using the general you in explaining why we don't give a shit about deetless wank on no-name players we've never heard about, which is precisely what that anon was commenting on
ain't anybody in this thread stupider than you right now, friend
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
no, in response to the anon claiming not to be op, i explicitly said i was using the general you in explaining why we don't give a shit about deetless wank on no-name players we've never heard about, which is precisely what that anon was commenting on
ain't anybody in this thread stupider than you right now, friend