Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 05:47 pm (UTC)(link)
everyone else: reads the room, shits on the floor, and wipes ass with curtains
lone socially deficient poster: uses stall

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 05:47 pm (UTC)(link)
fine i will. i love pears.

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 05:53 pm (UTC)(link)
this is the way.

Re: LUC

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)
do people know they're donating to a racist

Re: LUC

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
No. Most people don't live on wankgate 24/7.

Re: Duplicity

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Literally the most harmless player in the game. Has been there from the beginning, has a circle of CR that she plays with, and other than begging posts on her plurk, stays in her own lane.

Re: Duplicity

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)
not what others are saying

Re: Duplicity

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 07:40 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah but it came out that she's one of the ones complaining about luc here on wg so she had to go

the harassment story was just the good-sounding excuse they used to give her the boot

Re: Duplicity

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 08:08 pm (UTC)(link)
i can't tell if this is some kind of dumb joke or what

Re: Duplicity

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)
0/10 bait, not even trying

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Chromosomes?!

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah some anons like to try and get around the "don't call someone retarded" rule by implying the people who disagree with them have down's syndrome

Re: Duplicity

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 08:26 pm (UTC)(link)
get off the meme and close the richard spencer tab, luc

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)
it's nemo LOL

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't even think they're that lazy bc they clearly spend time curating their top levels and setting up threads, and they don't just wait for people to come to them either. It's just, like... idk. A witch cursed them to be unable to write tags??

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 08:45 pm (UTC)(link)
you sound like a debatelord on twitter with a classical bust user pic

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)
pre-cg era disney princesses, 90s anime characters, and starfire.

if they're playing one of them, have hundreds of icons, and their journal is fully tricked out with pretty graphics, you will never get tagged back.

Re: Duplicity

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)
does anyone have even a scrap of deets to back this up? one hopes that the mods do, but like, even a pastebin of them responding to plurks and being ignored would go a fair way towards proof

Re: Duplicity

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)
why do you need proof? the mods already banned them. i'm not a fan of the dup mod team but i know from experience that they won't do anything without concrete proof of someone breaking the rules. if they've banned them for harassing someone on discord, 100% they have deets to back it up.

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)
someone pick up that phone because I CALLED IT

anyway, yeah I've never gotten it either, seems a lot of effort for no output

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)
nah, i see her on the regular

maybe your brain just filters her out at this point

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 09:15 pm (UTC)(link)
slowpoke.jpg

Re: Duplicity

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 09:16 pm (UTC)(link)
who said need? i'm asking if anyone has any that they're willing to share. i'm not saying i won't believe this is real if not, but it's always nice when there's some kind of evidence other than "trust the mods on the word of an anon"

Re: Duplicity

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)
you don't have to trust the mods on the word of an anon, the player in question has plurked why she was banned

Re: Duplicity

(Anonymous) 2022-05-29 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
> the mods don't ban luc in spite of 10000 testimonials here on wg and at least 3+ people who've come to them logged in about the matter
> the mods do ban some harmless nobody literally nobody has ever cared about

"okay, so the mods were incompetent ABOUT THAT but when it comes to every other decision they make they are 100% on target!"

lol
lmao