ryanongosling: (Default)
Ryan Gosling ([personal profile] ryanongosling) wrote in [community profile] wankgate2024-09-16 03:31 am

(Anonymous) 2025-01-12 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)
she openly admitted being a bully in the screencap, so IDK what you're arguing about

Re: TLV

(Anonymous) 2025-01-12 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
do we know who the player who dropped was getting warned about, and who was doing the warning? i feel like that’s much more toxic than ic conflict being taken personally.

Re: TLV

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
the mods made an addendum on the ooc post about it

“Update: Regarding the recent situation, we've spoken privately to players involved. Some of the "warning a new player" behavior came from people who are not even in TLV. The players who were involved understand that they fucked up and have apologized. We do consider this behavior unacceptable and will not tolerate it in our game, and have issued warnings accordingly.

We didn't want to stir up more worry or drama publicly when the situation between players involved was resolved, but we want to acknowledge that the situation has been addressed, and we're sorry for any worry caused by the delay in doing so.

If anyone has further questions for us, you are always welcome to ask.”

https://lastvoyagesooc.dreamwidth.org/1981238.html

-1

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
no one in tlv is anywhere near being the biggest anything in dwrp

they're in the kiddie pool and we all know it

+2

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 12:31 am (UTC)(link)

Re: https://i.imgur.com/S7g7CvI.jpeg

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
is she one of those oldschool tlv players who changed their handles to hide their wanky pasts? tlv's been around forever and has more than a few of those types iirc

Re: TLV

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
truly vitamin d-deficient behavior on the part of the ones who weren’t even in the game

+1

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
Not a single one of their dedicated players would survive in any other game, either. They're like an uncontacted tribe, they only know their own ways.

Re: TLV

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 05:08 am (UTC)(link)
not in the game, but someone took IC conflict personally and they made a plurk about it saying how they felt targeted/attacked. Basically their character started some negative CR and they thought the response was directed at them more so than their character and apparently things snowballed after that.

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 05:55 am (UTC)(link)
a number of tlv players are in other games, which is easy to tell by looking at their plurk bios.

sa

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 05:56 am (UTC)(link)
sorry, missed "really dedicated" because it is too early in the morning for reading comprehension

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 07:50 am (UTC)(link)
please stop informing plurk every time your cat vomits

i dont know why you think this is something worth sharing with the class

Re: TLV

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 07:59 am (UTC)(link)
looks directly into the camera (wankgate)

Re: TLV

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 09:43 am (UTC)(link)
confused as to how "some" of the warning a new player could come from people not in game, how much of it was going on?

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 09:49 am (UTC)(link)
https://www.plurk.com/p/3gqyiachwm

of course it's this fucking guy arguing with literal children in public about the most non-issue issue of all time

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 10:14 am (UTC)(link)
i don't recognize any of those usernames so i don't know who you are "obviously" wanking on

but jchaosand and YonFellow were right in complaining about plurk pushing the same post over and over, it is indeed annoying. they didn't make a big deal out of it, they just said "plurk please stop". which is valid. it didn't become a big issue until boyo came to argue, they're the idiot in this

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 10:17 am (UTC)(link)
yon what the fuck. you're grown.

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 10:43 am (UTC)(link)
the plurk is barely noticeable

that is a child, most of the people talking in that plurk are minors, plurk has a big minor population

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 10:53 am (UTC)(link)
ayrt

i'm gonna be honest with you, i don't check the ages of people i talk to in random social media posts, and i don't know a single person who does that outside weird artists in twitter who don't understand they can't stop minors from looking at smutty fanart. checking boyo's profile doesn't give me their age either (or real age anyway, it says 84), so i hope you aren't expecting people to look through other people's posts to figure out their age like some detective.

but even if it was clear that they're a minor... i'm tired of this "oh don't be mean they're minors!!!" narrative that has been happening in certain spaces, mostly twitter (shocker /s). if you come to a public space and say something, then you better learn to expect people replying to you. i could understand leaving alone ACTUAL children (as in 5-6 yo) who still don't know very well what they're saying, but teenagers? teenagers must be responsible for opening their mouths.

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 11:31 am (UTC)(link)
it's just clearly a child by the way they're typing lol why are you making it even weirder? you pick fights with 15 year olds on twitter?

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 11:45 am (UTC)(link)
i don't know who i fight with on social media. i don't check their profiles and i don't assume based on typing style because i know adults that type like teens, including dwrpers.

but if someone comes to a discussion post to say "ao3 shouldn't allowed incest" (to name a random example of an argument i've had) then they're getting a proper response. being a teenager doesn't mean they can bother people and then complain when they get the same in return. not to mention jchaosand, nivisecond and YonFellow were always polite.

you know who is making it weird? you. and op, if you aren't them. idk why age matters so much. i could've understood if this had been a complaint about derailing open plurks, but no, this is literally about arguing with a teenager. it's also weird that only one person is being called out when multiple people made the same complaint.

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 12:07 pm (UTC)(link)
weird comment

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 12:09 pm (UTC)(link)
"literal children"? lol what

are you an anti that got lost

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 12:44 pm (UTC)(link)
oh you're twitterpilled

i will explain: no one actually gaf about the children, this is about yonfellow having the kind of personality that gets him hung up on derailing a public plurk for hours over something incredibly inconsequential

because it's yonfellow

(frozen comment) Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2025-01-13 12:49 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

idk who this yonfellow is, but they aren't the only person talking about this on the plurk. so this smells of grudgewank.

and if it isn't about children, why mention them on the op?