Re: da

(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 03:37 am (UTC)(link)
The way the mun handled it. Talking it up as some great awareness-raising thing and making up banners declaring it to be ~the Sarah Conner cancer plot~ in fancy script and

Bluh it was just really gross.

dda

(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 04:14 am (UTC)(link)
the only awareness thing about it was that it was run in october which is where the mun got the title from. stupid? yes. gross? no. it was a personal plot, one that needed discussion (which was done on a spam comm) and was cleared with the mods. could have done without the shiny graphics but if you look at her ax journal she's still photoshopping everything in sight.

big deal, she wanted to explore sarah's cancer and negative power effects. she wasn't the first person in cnc to do something with cancer. first to name a plot and put up a synopsis plus timeline, maybe. that was done in sarah's journal. she also had a majority support of players posting to that thread. it was stupid plot name wank/stupid graphics wank, imho.

god forbid anyone get excited about a personal plot

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 04:31 am (UTC)(link)
I think you'll find that that's not the way anybody else remembers it.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 05:36 am (UTC)(link)
all i remember is a bunch of buttmad rp!s frenzy about the title and the posts on the spam com and sarah's journal.

but ok.

this is pretty old wank anyway and she's been out of cnc for awhile. go find the post, then.

Re: dda

(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 02:02 pm (UTC)(link)
whiteknight alert