http://pastebin.com/sH052RdL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
seriously? people are such delicate flowers now that you have to put a content warning for rape on a plurk post that says rape in the freaking title??

Re: http://pastebin.com/sH052RdL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I raised my eyebrow when I saw it had a content warning on it for rape all of the sudden....if you overuse content warnings like that, it's just going to end up mockable. (See "trigger.")

http://www.plurk.com/p/ifuqd2

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
full plurk here for anyone looking.

but what a fucking stupid argument, jfc. it's like the epitome of arguing about semantics.

Re: http://www.plurk.com/p/ifuqd2

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
the scrolling function on this plurk is terrible

Re: http://www.plurk.com/p/ifuqd2

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 05:51 am (UTC)(link)
that entire layout is terrible

Re: http://www.plurk.com/p/ifuqd2

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
oh look renne is in that plurk

does she read things before she replies jw

Re: http://pastebin.com/sH052RdL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
is this about rp

if not then fuck off

Re: http://pastebin.com/sH052RdL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
for the last fucking time, if it involves rpers, it's related enough to rp to be posted here. this is how it's been ever since the acj days. if you don't like it, scroll past.

Re: http://pastebin.com/sH052RdL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 04:57 am (UTC)(link)
It doesn't involve RP at all. It's just the people passing around another fucking annoying article on plurk like the umpteen-hundred OTHER replurks about political cause this and donations that and windows-is-fucking-up-and-no-one-was-surprised.

Not RP-relevant. Won't do a thing for games, memes, dressing rooms, or museboxes. Not about anyone's characters, not about any particular player or even whining superficially about a player/group of players. It's interesting reading and that's it. It can be deleted from WG.

Re: http://pastebin.com/sH052RdL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 07:16 am (UTC)(link)
Hateboner has said, very bluntly, that something about people that RP is RP-related.

Calm your butthurt.

Re: http://pastebin.com/sH052RdL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 09:06 am (UTC)(link)
Okay, anon, this is how it was spelled out by Hateboner.

There is a person (or are people) saying shit one could find stupid in this plurk. Will everyone find it stupid? No. But if someone who plays with this person was unaware of them exhibiting this sort of behavior, they might now decide that they don't want to continue playing with someone who says things like this.

It isn't personal information and it has the potential to have a real effect on someone's RP experience. Ergo, it stays.

Re: http://pastebin.com/sH052RdL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 02:41 pm (UTC)(link)
i think that "rule" has been getting out of hand too

Re: http://pastebin.com/sH052RdL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 02:51 pm (UTC)(link)
you must be new.

but if it chafes your ass so much go report it, instead of bawwing here like us anons have the power to delete it. otherwise, sorry for the loss of your scroll button.

Re: http://pastebin.com/sH052RdL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 03:09 pm (UTC)(link)
it's not even interesting reading tho

but sure is sameanon in the replies

Re: http://pastebin.com/sH052RdL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
sj cargo cult in action

but does monokuma play anywhere

Re: http://pastebin.com/sH052RdL

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 05:15 am (UTC)(link)
that plurk was obnoxious waaaaaay before that point tbh

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 06:07 am (UTC)(link)
um, does making another plurk on their PUBLIC timeline and saying 'oh well, i'm not saying this on that other plurk because it isn't the place for me to say this stuff teehee' seem sort of pants on the head to anyone else?

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 01:34 pm (UTC)(link)
it's silly, but as it wasn't anything like "lol that cw bitch is a loser amirite" it's hardly wankworthy

(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 07:03 pm (UTC)(link)
not really? it's their plurk they can post however they want