hateboner: (Let you finish)
hateboner ([personal profile] hateboner) wrote in [community profile] wankgate2013-09-06 02:39 am
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 01:54 pm (UTC)(link)
why can't you care about them on a filter

(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 05:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Do the same for all your fandom things, then.

(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 06:22 pm (UTC)(link)
there are 3 flight rising plurks for every 1 fandom plurk on my timeline right now

da

(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
and there are 4 attack on titan and pacific rim plurks each for every 1 flight rising plurk on my timeline right now. what's your point?

da

(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
the point is you're damn lucky if that's the case

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
seeing as i give less than no fucks about either attack on titan or pacific rim, no, i'm not.

(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 10:26 am (UTC)(link)
when my plurks about fandoms make me sound like a spambot, that argument will hold water.

(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Your argument is still, "People can't talk about what they want to talk about on their own plurk because I don't like how much they talk about it."

(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 03:53 pm (UTC)(link)
You mean an attitude that has ALWAYS been passed around this section of WG about every over-exposed fandom nobody could shut the fuck up about, even since before Flight Rising was even a thing?

You poor baby.

da

(Anonymous) 2013-09-08 04:46 pm (UTC)(link)
And it was a fucking stupid, childish, entitled attitude then, too.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only