it said "pretty much all porn" so I misquoted in this instance but considering upthread I actually already said "i'm usually uninterested in other things so i admittedly don't have a good gauge of what 'most' is" i am pretty sure yes i can read lol
You're still derailing from the original topic just so that you can try to look "right" in a different point entirely. Just because you admit you did it deliberately doesn't change that.
I didn't say I did it deliberately; I made a mistake.
let me break this down for you
>person says gifs are objectifying/degrading >someone else says what kinds of things are those because most things are degrading >another person accuses above anon of not watching enough porn to find stuff that doesn't fit that category >gets shot down >i chime in to say amateur porn is often very obviously consensual and not exploitative >someone says "we're not talking about amateur porn" >i am confused. i then explain why someone might want to question "what exactly do you qualify as sexist and degrading"
but you can think what you want to think about what my intent was that's okay
I was arguing that what ayrt was going on about was unrelated to the original comment and a painfully straight example of "well actually" cpmments. But they're still going on about it! But I shouldn't; sorry about that.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
ayrt
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 07:49 pm (UTC)(link)ayrt
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 08:08 pm (UTC)(link)let me break this down for you
>person says gifs are objectifying/degrading
>someone else says what kinds of things are those because most things are degrading
>another person accuses above anon of not watching enough porn to find stuff that doesn't fit that category
>gets shot down
>i chime in to say amateur porn is often very obviously consensual and not exploitative
>someone says "we're not talking about amateur porn"
>i am confused. i then explain why someone might want to question "what exactly do you qualify as sexist and degrading"
but you can think what you want to think about what my intent was that's okay
da
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 08:09 pm (UTC)(link)ayrt
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)toodles
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-07 08:57 pm (UTC)(link)