Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
does it matter? beautifulsavages didn't stick just to smut, nor did sosa. hell, the famous bowmanship sosa roast didn't even happen in a smut meme at all

cockhops go anywhere to hop dat cock, and they always drag all the quality down with them, much like your whining is dragging this already uninteresting thread down

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
as the above anon says, darcy's not really an mcu character so much as a comedic device. she'd not mentioned outside of the thor movies, unlike jane foster and selvig. to the avengers, she'd be some weird college student, so they'd have no desire to hang out with her nor would they know her. and it's not like thor would go around introducing her to people, since they're more like occasional buddies than real friends.

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
the number one complaint i hear about jane is that she's played by natalie portman. i wish that wasn't such a huge strike against her. jane is a brilliant female scientist, and quite beautiful to boot (if her brains aren't enough to attract people to the character). i'd prefer more people played her than the zillion of flat, robot-like natashas out there.

da

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
if i'm understanding right i think the op is pretty much saying exactly that but in a really convoluted way. what i'm taking away is that it's subjective. if i was a notorious wanker i wouldn't see people defending me as whiteknights. people on the other side of the disagreement would probably see it otherwise.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
she's still a valid character in the movie. whether people want to actually say she's all avengery or a self insert isn't really a point. she's more valid than matt from death note or any fucking tolkien from the stupid goddamn fucking not-book that crop up. she has enough screen time to get a personality from, has a background and interaction with the main char. so why shit on this particular one all the time?

simple fact is, you don't want to play with her, you don't play with her. but if someone wants to play her, that's their right, self insert or not. just avoid her if the mere existence of a quirky char that people can identify with more easily than the son of an alien god bothers you that much.

Re: http://bakerstreet.dreamwidth.org/2495562.html?thread=1276834378#cmt1276834378

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
i've come to hate darcy lewis because of this shit (not as much this darcy, but darcys in general). if she's not being self-inserted on and people projecting onto her all the ways they wished they were "cool" in college, then they're playing her as this sex kitten who can seduce all the guys.

really she's a moderately annoying and inconsiderate brat of a college student who ignores other people's boundaries and probably sticks around jane because janes's out there enough to keep putting up with her where most people wouldn't.

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:27 am (UTC)(link)
really? because the main complaint i hear is that she's boring, flat, and poorly shoehorned in as thor's love interest. being brilliant doesn't make her well-written, and she isn't. i'd still take one jane over a thousand shitty darcys, but lbr those movies aren't about the female cast so much as the thorki eyecandy.

natalie portman honestly has nothing to do with it. she's a badly managed character in what are honestly pretty bad movies outside the conflict with loki, imo. if it weren't for him i don't think people would care nearly so much about them.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
so which shitty darcy do you play?

also matt from death note has as much characterization as darcy, this reach.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
> she's still a valid character in the movie

she's really not, and your insistence that she is is hilarious and sad. she literally has no personality other than 'quirky n' feisty', she's like the mcu equivalent of link or mario. yeah, she talks, but she doesn't say anything. she's just 'oh look at me i'm so quirky i got a taser and i go to college and i have a bumbling male sidekick!' she was practically made to be projected on

she has zero reason to interact with people like bucky or clint (and it's telling of the player's cockhoppy intentions that they never tag any of the non-pretty white boy mcu characters). just give it up, darcy sucks and this cockhop playing her sucks too, just like every other darcy player

da

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
"pretty bad movies"

the thor movies are streets ahead of the shit iron-man films so idk why we're dumping on them

+1

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
darcy stan so showed their hand with that last comment, i can't even

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
this. jane's problem is that all the hints of an interesting character get brushed aside for more thor/loki screentime and even for darcy. the movies would have been more interesting and her a more compelling character if they cut down on scenes with darcy having no real purpose besides existing and fleshed out jane since she is supposed to be one of the main characters of that branch of the franchise.

dark world would have been the perfect opportunity and they blew it.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
L M A O

anon plz

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
i still can't believe people ship darcy/bucky

as if bucky, after all the shit he's been through, would be able to parse being around someone as 24/7 fluffy cheese llamas tee hee no personal space ever, much less be with them sexually.

i'm not even a bucky woobifier, i just think it's shitty to put someone who'd have tons and tons of ptsd and fucked up issues with someone who's been canonically shown to have zero chill. like, i'm actually kind of offended by it.

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
yeah, because when i think "good players" my first thought sure does go to memes.

the stick. your ass. part their company.

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
i don't even play from the fandom because i learned long ago when the movies first came out that they were a magnet for anyone that wanted to shove cock a into ass b. all of them are like that and i quite honestly pity any female cast members in any of the movies because of it. most particularly the love interests.

and before you call me a cockhop self inserter, i play male characters and i play both m/f and m/m. i just wish there were more people that played the characters that wanted to actually PLAY the CHARACTER instead of a dick sheath with Steve's face.

+1

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
i remember actually being excited for dark world because the promos and early interviews implified jane would get more screentime and become more fleshed out

and then they half-delivered. sure, she got more screentime, but she was still as flat and underdeveloped as before. scenes wasted on darcy and her man-slave could have been used to show us a real look at jane foster, who she is and what makes her tick. instead she was mostly relegated to distressed damsel/ineffective bystander once again

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
i love high fantasy shit and thor's one of the few ways i get it on the big screen since lotr/hobbit's finished, anon. iron-man's just another terrible sci fi abortion in a sea of sci fi abortions.

Re: ANON HATE BATTLE ROYALE: QUARTERFINALS

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
tie, can't decide
eppy
saph
murder
ally
nemo
second
quix

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
in all honesty, bucky would be more likely to snap darcy's neck just to shut her up than he ever would be to date her or whatever

part of why the bucky woobifying frustrates me so much is that they neuter the dude. this character is supposed to be a handful of fragmented memories away from a literal killing machine, and in most player's hands he's just a jellyroll in need of the healing cock/college vag

Re: The Stupidest Things You've Ever Been Complained Or Wanked On

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
some tittybaby bitched about my attitude but never brought up any deets. literally just "this person has a shitty attitude weeeh" and when other anons asked for deets, they kept quiet about it

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
i quite honestly pity any female cast members in any of the movies because of it. most particularly the love interests.

...the love interests were already written like shit all by themselves, anon. focus being drawn away from them onto the prettyboys didn't help, but jane, darcy, pepper, etc. have never been stellar characters on their own. they're more wasted sources of potential than anything else.

and let's not even get into natasha and how they fumbled her into the worst STRONG FEMALE CHARACTER poster child ever. female characters are treated like shit in mcu so it shouldn't be surprising they get the shaft in rp too.

the only exception is MAYBE peggy and i'm not even sure she counts since she was pretty bland before the prequel series came out for her.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
dat hyphen

it's spider-man that has the hyphen

there is no hyphen in iron man







anyway the first iron man movie was really good

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
thor's not really all that high fantasy tho, especially not since dark world which clearly had a technological bent. at best it's a fantasy/sci-fi hybrid, and a pretty bland one at that

say what you will about the quality of the writing in the iron man movies, but there's a reason robert downey jr's smug stark is basically credited with jump-starting the mcu. i don't even like his character and i have to admit he's still eminently entertaining

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2015-04-04 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
it's because she's about as exciting as cardboard and the writers know it. there's nothing to give her because she's a poorly conceived character from start to finish. for someone supposedly so smart she does some awfully stupid things.