did she announce this on her plurk or something? because not everyone is on her plurk, and she could have just kept the page up but wiped the commission info and put up an apology.
Instead of, you know, locking it and making it look like she's trying to hide her shit.
You'd still get people saying she's not being truthful about or whatever, but it would have looked a hell of a lot better. Likewise, if she would have responded to the coder who replied to her post requesting her to take it down (and since I talked to said coder after, Trace hadn't responded to anything the coder sent her and the reply on the post itself was a last resort).
She hasn't said a single thing to the coder in question, however. This has already been confirmed.
So yeah, I call massive bullshit. Especially if she's trying to say she has said something. She doesn't have to cater to the peanut gallery, but she can at least get off her ass and try to make some sort of effort towards resolving the matter instead of making it look like she's just trying to cover shit up again.
how do you know she's not lying about contacting the other coder though? for all you know she hadn't talked to anyone and is just saying that to cover her ass, and at this point i wouldn't put it past her to do just that.
da
(Anonymous) 2015-11-17 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)but of course you fucks are reaching for everything in the book to justify yourselves and trace's actions.
da
(Anonymous) 2015-11-17 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)Instead of, you know, locking it and making it look like she's trying to hide her shit.
You'd still get people saying she's not being truthful about or whatever, but it would have looked a hell of a lot better. Likewise, if she would have responded to the coder who replied to her post requesting her to take it down (and since I talked to said coder after, Trace hadn't responded to anything the coder sent her and the reply on the post itself was a last resort).
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2015-11-17 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)As much as I would've liked to see her apologising publicly, she doesn't have to cater to the peanut gallery
DA
(Anonymous) 2015-11-17 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)So yeah, I call massive bullshit. Especially if she's trying to say she has said something. She doesn't have to cater to the peanut gallery, but she can at least get off her ass and try to make some sort of effort towards resolving the matter instead of making it look like she's just trying to cover shit up again.
dda
(Anonymous) 2015-11-17 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)