nah it was all Anon here on WG but it was obviously her. who else would come steamrolling in like FUCK YOU IF YOU SAY ANNIE SUCKS LOOK AT HER CASTMATES HUH HUH HUH FUCK THOSE FUCKING CLIQUEY FUCKS type shit. embarrassing and obvious
kc herself was acting like a snotty piece of shit about the most random things on plurk around the same time. not hard to put 2 and 2 together
she also had a habit of writing big giant plurk manifestos about how much better she could mod cdc and was party to bootsie's big plan to speak on behalf of players purportedly too "afraid" to talk to the mods, back when it was only bootsie & co who had any really egregious mod issues. and those generally boiled down to "weeeh i can't infomod weh"
i've got no horse in this race. don't know who she is, just checked a longass namedrop for something interesting. but it's dumb to assume you know an anon is the person you think they are without an anonfail to back it up. people openly admit here all the time that they come into game and namedrop threads deliberately stirring shit and trying to sound like other people.
flatview anon who may have missed other points upthread but why would someone shittalk their own cast just because their character got dropped here? like, did she have a beef with anyone in the cast or are anons just guessing it was her?
I remember that shittalking thread and I think the idea was that she had thought her cast was complaining about her anon, so "she" supposedly tried smearing them in return
in case you were wondering why this comment has so many whiteknights suddenly, it's because kc is a part of the biggest circlejerk. they all jump on even the tiniest comment about any one of them.
-no, but there were totally a ton of anon comments that HAD to be her because reasons.
-but a lot of anons admit to shit stirring and trying to look like other people in game thread and name drop threads. that's not really proof.
-yeah, that "proof" didn't really make much sense because it's not logical.
-i know the thread they're talking about. some people thought it was proof but nothing was confirmed.
-so there are no deets or pastebins.
-if all of this is true, then where are the pastebins?
-WHITEKNIGHTS! WHITEKNIGHTS!
let's count. 3 requests for plurks and pastebins.
1 anon playing internet detective over anon comments.
1 anon recalling the anon threads in question but expressing doubt that they were real proof.
1 anon saying anon comments aren't proof because wg regs admit to shit stirring and trying to impersonate other people all the time.
1 anon saying that the supposed proof doesn't make sense.
1 anon screeching whiteknights.
if you think any of that actually qualifies as whiteknighting, then you're either new here or have such a huge grudgeboner that you can't see past it. if you have actual plurks or pastebins, then cough them up. if you don't, then go stroke your boring grudgeboner somewhere else and stop shitting up an already useless namedrop thread. anything with this many comments ought to have some damned deets if they actually exist.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
anonsitting) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
wankgate2015-11-14 06:08 pm
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2015-11-19 11:30 am (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2015-11-19 02:03 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-19 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)if this is true then someone like that probably shouldn't be running a game like she plans to
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-19 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)kc herself was acting like a snotty piece of shit about the most random things on plurk around the same time. not hard to put 2 and 2 together
she also had a habit of writing big giant plurk manifestos about how much better she could mod cdc and was party to bootsie's big plan to speak on behalf of players purportedly too "afraid" to talk to the mods, back when it was only bootsie & co who had any really egregious mod issues. and those generally boiled down to "weeeh i can't infomod weh"
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-19 07:06 pm (UTC)(link)i've got no horse in this race. don't know who she is, just checked a longass namedrop for something interesting. but it's dumb to assume you know an anon is the person you think they are without an anonfail to back it up. people openly admit here all the time that they come into game and namedrop threads deliberately stirring shit and trying to sound like other people.
you have suspicion. proof it ain't.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-19 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)honest question here.
da
(Anonymous) 2015-11-19 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-19 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 01:47 am (UTC)(link)or like anything connecting her to bootsie's big plan outside of anon hearsay, or anyone to bootsie's big plan
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 02:56 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 03:03 am (UTC)(link)totally.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 03:05 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 04:46 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 05:52 am (UTC)(link)-are there plurks or pastebins?
-no, but there were totally a ton of anon comments that HAD to be her because reasons.
-but a lot of anons admit to shit stirring and trying to look like other people in game thread and name drop threads. that's not really proof.
-yeah, that "proof" didn't really make much sense because it's not logical.
-i know the thread they're talking about. some people thought it was proof but nothing was confirmed.
-so there are no deets or pastebins.
-if all of this is true, then where are the pastebins?
-WHITEKNIGHTS! WHITEKNIGHTS!
let's count. 3 requests for plurks and pastebins.
1 anon playing internet detective over anon comments.
1 anon recalling the anon threads in question but expressing doubt that they were real proof.
1 anon saying anon comments aren't proof because wg regs admit to shit stirring and trying to impersonate other people all the time.
1 anon saying that the supposed proof doesn't make sense.
1 anon screeching whiteknights.
if you think any of that actually qualifies as whiteknighting, then you're either new here or have such a huge grudgeboner that you can't see past it. if you have actual plurks or pastebins, then cough them up. if you don't, then go stroke your boring grudgeboner somewhere else and stop shitting up an already useless namedrop thread. anything with this many comments ought to have some damned deets if they actually exist.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 03:01 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 07:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-11-20 07:15 am (UTC)(link)