Re: CA:CW SPOILERS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:45 am (UTC)(link)
more like "the woman he had some ust with before he was frozen"

Re: CA:CW SPOILERS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:46 am (UTC)(link)
the kiss was pretty mutual, but they're still just some people with a kiss and some ust between them, not going steady

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 04:00 am (UTC)(link)
In a perfect world where they didn't decide Korra was bi just because the fanbase wanted it and paired her up with literally her only option as far as girlfriends go, they would have waited until the comics to say she was bi and introduce a new character to be her girlfriend instead (or ideally have her stay single but W/E).

Now Korra is stuck with the world's most boring girlfriend. I'm pretty sure she would have better sex with a realdoll.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 04:01 am (UTC)(link)
I understood that reference

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 04:10 am (UTC)(link)
http://www.shortpacked.com/index.php?id=7

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
the plurker in questioned linked their etsy store as a means to help with their monetary bind. the store has a lot of jewelry for sale. this person asked for help by offering stuff they actually make and sell on etsy. they did mention their crisis but they aren't asking for people to just throw money at them. they even mentioned offering a sale if enough people were interested.

not sure what anon's problem is here tbh. shit happens. i'd rather have someone offering stuff they made than begging on gofundme for free money and that's what this person was doing.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 04:20 am (UTC)(link)
I want to block you to avoid seeing how negative you are, but we're in enough plurks together that our mutual friends would notice and I'm not ready for that fallout

da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 04:42 am (UTC)(link)
maybe, but that doesn't mean their reasons are any less valid?

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 04:58 am (UTC)(link)
"no, it's not, but the incest route gets brought up because sharon and peggy are related, which is why i think it's a stupid fucking argument."

only by really stupid people. it's only incest if sharon was related to steve.

Re: QUIX

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:04 am (UTC)(link)
everything is complete if it's over. /s

Re: http://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/43554.html?thread=172000034#cmt172000034

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:06 am (UTC)(link)
it was the same thing on a smaller scale. there's been a pattern of airi making people uncomfortable in game because of her pushy and guilt-tripping behavior. a number of plots got stopped in their tracks because she didn't want to deal with the ripple effects they would have on her character, regardless of whether or not kido would be directly involved.

Re: http://no-apologies.dreamwidth.org/12055.html

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:09 am (UTC)(link)
When I was in college I took a psych course during which we were shown footage of a guy with schizophrenia trying to describe what he did the week before.

That's sort of what this post reminds me of.

I feel the cosmos

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:13 am (UTC)(link)
Cancer came scuttling back!

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:20 am (UTC)(link)
remember when adult swim mocked inuyasha fines by having a commercial that was just inuyasha and kagome yelling each other's names?

Re: LITTLE HADES

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:20 am (UTC)(link)
wasn't the other trek just hellion under a different name? could have sworn it was something along those lines.

Re: ITT WORST CANON COUPLES

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:23 am (UTC)(link)
as much as this was the epic will they/won't they/oh no brainwash that some people love, it's really nuriko's story that made me ragequit. i don't expect sensitivity about legit trans or gay issues from japan but everything about the way nuriko's story progressed definitely felt bad to me and i can't really explain why. the motivation and what he wanted to be was there, but when it happened it just felt like they were stereotyping less masculine gay men with vagina-envy and that he couldn't be who he was as he was?

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:25 am (UTC)(link)
pardon me up until like maybe early s anime mamoru was gold

stupid stupid gold

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:30 am (UTC)(link)
I go to work i go home i go to work again

this must be a parody

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:35 am (UTC)(link)
yeah, definitely. imo idling out's a totally different animal than dropping, though. especially when it comes at the ass end of a cycle of hiatus/strike/barely scrape by ac.

Re: CEREALIA

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:35 am (UTC)(link)
well rip van winkle's gone

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:35 am (UTC)(link)
disliking something is fine.

calling it "absolutely disgusting" is when it becomes truly hilarious.

Re: ITT WORST CANON COUPLES

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:40 am (UTC)(link)
what? Suki and Sokka were awesome

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:41 am (UTC)(link)
it definitely is. there should be no shame in dropping if you realize it's not working out.

Re: CA:CW SPOILERS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:45 am (UTC)(link)
there are more kinds of gross than incest, you troglodite

Re: UNPOPULAR RP OPINIONS

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:56 am (UTC)(link)
tbh? I'm usually familiar with only 10% myself. And the majority of my tagging is with characters I don't know.

But if I'm not interested in at even two or three characters in the cast just by seeing they're there, it is kind of a damper.