Elle said she stopped playing vlad during that conversation, but as I was posting on meme's that day, she was playing against Dominus in the tfln thread
omg you're just a jealous little whiny baby
do you have any more pastebins? because i don't blame any of them for reacting this way toward you, jesus christ
talk about being a jealous little whiny baby, i never once spoke to theblackrose but she blocked me on plurk for being friends with elle when she flounced out months and months ago
good riddance to bad rubbish. it was so cringey trying to plan things with both of them without investigador trying to smear herself all over everything
all of this just reeks of psycho overinvestment. you know, back in the day when people were first dropping investigador as being shit in memes and it seemed like it was just for being enthusiastic about tagging, i actually thought it was pretty shitty.
looks like they called it right, though. thirsty, rude, grudgey and boundary pushing. if i had to deal with that, i'd drop it like it was hot, too.
just goes to show, kids. where there's smoke there's usually fire.
(frozen comment) Re: Updated, since I missed this bit. http://pastebin.com/JHU168Tz
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 07:09 am (UTC)(link)omg you're just a jealous little whiny baby
do you have any more pastebins? because i don't blame any of them for reacting this way toward you, jesus christ
(frozen comment) +1
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 07:29 am (UTC)(link)nice job policing someone else's muse too
(frozen comment) +1
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 08:01 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) Re: +1
(frozen comment) Re: +1
good riddance to bad rubbish. it was so cringey trying to plan things with both of them without investigador trying to smear herself all over everything
(frozen comment) +1
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 07:33 am (UTC)(link)looks like they called it right, though. thirsty, rude, grudgey and boundary pushing. if i had to deal with that, i'd drop it like it was hot, too.
just goes to show, kids. where there's smoke there's usually fire.
(frozen comment) Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 07:39 am (UTC)(link)They were right on