da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
so what? i think you're gross, personally, for saying that someone can't find and click with a sibling/relative of someone they used to date, like they're off limits. and these circumstances are so fucking out of the norm, trying to bring relations into it is just idiotic. it might maybe possibly become a sort of maybe thing if sharon was her granddaughter. but it's not her child at all. not her child's child. this isn't some offshoot of peggy's loins. this is a distant relative. the gross factor would be age, but that doesn't even come into play here because of the timeline issues. so... you're clutching your pearls over stupid shit and i hope you enjoy it.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
sorry, i forgot to fill out my pearl clutching forms so you could pre-approve what i dislike. next time i swear it'll be on your desk before you get ready to go to your girlfriend's family reunion to prowl for future dates.

sa

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:32 am (UTC)(link)
also

that moment when an aunt is a "distant relative."

that's not like a fifth cousin twice removed.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:38 am (UTC)(link)
keep clutching your pearls. he was frozen for 70+ years. sharon's likely a 'niece' in that she's a child of a child of her sibling. if she was born of peggy's children's generation, she'd be too old. so yeah, she's a distant relative. peggy's a great-aunt (unless peggy had a baby sibling who then had a child 40+ years later).

either way, you're still an idiot.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
i'm going to shove these pearls up your ass if you don't stop being purposefully dense.

sharon's in her early 30s. she's in a reasonable age bracket to be a child of peggy's sibling, especially if they were a younger sibling. disregarding that, peggy and sharon were close enough that sharon was asked to speak at peggy's funeral and that peggy was the inspiration for sharon joining shield. she was, at the very least, a grandmother figure.

if you don't see how there's something weird about listening to your old-ass aunt talking about this hunk she wanted to take to the malt shop then deciding you want to get some of that dick, idk what to tell you.

steve initiated the kiss, though, iirc and that's even fucking worse. he literally just learned sharon has kept another secret from him and he wants to suck her face?

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
steve's in his early 30s too. that doesn't magically erase 70+ years of time going by. if peggy had a sibling that was five years younger who then had their own child, there's no way they waited 40+ years to have a child to have sharon be that child. so it's likely there's another generation in there. math. it's your friend. use it.

as for the rest of it, i'm not negating that sharon/peggy were close, but steve rogers/captain america was an icon for two-three generations. lots of people probably talked about steve rogers. what about all the uso girls? what if he dated one of their grandchildren/relatives? why is it only weird that a girl he didn't even date had a kid who grew up to have a thing for him? let me tell you something, Pearl, if my grandmother knew a guy and had a thing for him and he was frozen in time and i knew him and he was a steve rogers hunk? you bet your ass i'd try to hit that.

and who cares? like, really? who fucking cares? why isn't steve allowed to have his own feelings about who he wants. if he can get over it, maybe you need to take a page out of his book. steve's allowed to get some.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
oh my god it's a fictional character, i don't have to "respect" steve roger's fucking feelings.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:57 am (UTC)(link)
no, but you're sure making an effort to put real life shit that doesn't even apply on a fake fucking character. so, you know, pick a side. either they're fictional and who cares, or omg it's so gross incest relations omg the age difference omg her family omg omg.

you don't even know what you're mad about.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:59 am (UTC)(link)
i think a fictional situation is gross

i also don't have to act like a fictional character has rights, feelings, and that i have to respect their life choices

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
i think you're gross.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 03:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:44 am (UTC)(link)
i kinda wish dramatic readings were still en vogue, your bitchy rants would be a hit

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 05:35 am (UTC)(link)
disliking something is fine.

calling it "absolutely disgusting" is when it becomes truly hilarious.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 02:08 pm (UTC)(link)
so calling stuff like pedophilia absolutely disgusting is "hilarious" to you?

ok

da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)
oh look, another idiot who doesn't know what pedophilia actually is

go back to tumblr

(meanwhile i'm going to laugh and shake my head because i don't ship steve with anyone, and i'm beginning to believe that's a good thing)

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)
oh, look, another sharon stan who's too dense to realize how incredibly disgusting and problematic her ship is

i bet you support trendy kiddy diddler supporters like alison rapp too

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
you keep doubling down on this stupidity.

first you equate it to incest, then claim that you're not calling it incest.

now you're calling dating a grown-ass woman "pedophilia".

this just keeps getting better and more hilarious.

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:32 pm (UTC)(link)
not sure if they're a tumblrina or just a troll who's trying way too hard

both are just far too likely

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:32 pm (UTC)(link)
keep licking alison rapp's pedoclit on twitter, twit

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:36 pm (UTC)(link)
ok now you're not even trying anymore

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:37 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:38 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:38 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:38 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:40 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:41 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:43 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:45 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:47 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:48 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:31 pm (UTC)(link)
except i don't give two shits about sharon and don't ship anyone with steve, you fuckwit

did you even read my comment or are you too busy getting too high off your own tumblrina farts

like, i even said i don't ship steve with anyone

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:33 pm (UTC)(link)
same here, but of course, finding all of this hilarious means you're shipping it hard.

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:37 pm (UTC)(link)
it's so fucking stupid

and if by chance they really are a stucky stan, then it's even more stupid

my ot3 (the only thing i heavily ship in mcu) never had a chance of becoming canon but you don't see me crying about how problematic everything else is

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:33 pm (UTC)(link)
okay but how do you feel about alison rapp

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:35 pm (UTC)(link)
i don't care about her either

but keep trying

keep reaching

and by god keep fucking that chicken

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-05-07 03:37 pm (UTC)(link)
i feel that she has nothing to do with anything we're talking about.

kissing an adult is not pedophilia, and you're not even trying anymore.

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:38 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:39 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:39 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:40 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:41 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:43 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:40 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:42 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:44 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:45 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:46 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:47 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:49 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 15:58 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 16:02 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 16:25 (UTC) - Expand

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-05-07 19:55 (UTC) - Expand