so are hanzo and mccree supposed to be this rampagingly gay for each other or am i just missing something
i'm mostly canonblind outside a few quick plays but mccree really doesn't strike me as the type to go I DON'T WANNA BE FRIENDS I WANNA BE WITH YOU KISS KISS KISS SMOOCH SMOOCH to people, especially hanzo
especially after barely a month of in game development
they have absolutely ZERO connection in game, as far as I can tell, but they became a pet masc4masc ship among the fandom who are grossed out by old men.
so, yeah, it's OOC and stupid, especially a month out.
tbh I feel like almost all of this overwatch cast is a little lackluster...
like I can't put my finger on specifics and I don't have anything against the canon in itself, but I'll admit that it salts my buns a little more than it should with how full up the game cap is right now and all the more interesting characters still waiting in the app queue
probably because there just isn't that much canon personality for them to work with right now and characterization might have to change at the drop of a hat to remain ic. blizzard basically admitted they're making it all up as they go.
i would truly love to have dumb melodramatic yaois in my life.
sorry if this rustles your hornets, anon, but i bet these guys want to have fun more than they want to perform highly IC versions of characters you just admitted you don't know or care about. my god, i'm actually having trouble thinking of anything less important than whether same-canon characters are doing some shippy bullshit with each other in an RP game. just out of curiosity, which one of their dicks did you want your character to sit on?
Not in the game but even though it's one of the meanest things to do in this fandom-based hobby, my favorite wankgate moments are community wtf-ing over people's nonsensical ships. Like those terrible Steve/Bucky logs from Hadriel.
i could care less who ships what but when players playing ooc adaptations of their characters are hogging spots in a capped game, it's something to be chafed about
ooc is still ooc, and this is stupidly ooc. i don't see why it should get a free pass just because it happens a lot in other places. play the character you apped, not some cockhungry yaoi abortion.
hanzo and mccree never interact in the actual canon (which is the comics/movies/other supplementary material, not the game itself), it's literally a ship born out of "they're hot so they're fucking" with a chemistry that's 100% made up. it happening gradually over time could make sense, it happening after a month? nah. someone just wants to get their yaoi on and couldn't be assed to keep it to memes and museboxes.
but pretty much all overwatch ships have zero basis in canon with a few exceptions (jack/ana or jack/gabriel, maybe ana/gabriel) so i'd say get used to it once more of them start popping up in games.
Unrelated to the doc yaoishit but what's the point of changing AC to make characters interact with each other if they weren't gonna wait for AC anyway before reducing the cap from 8 to 6?
I'm less concerned at the moment about characters playing their yaois together than I am about the players who are taking their third hiatus on and off in a row who've been in game longer than me but who I've seen in maybe one thread.
FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 04:07 am (UTC)(link)so are hanzo and mccree supposed to be this rampagingly gay for each other or am i just missing something
i'm mostly canonblind outside a few quick plays but mccree really doesn't strike me as the type to go I DON'T WANNA BE FRIENDS I WANNA BE WITH YOU KISS KISS KISS SMOOCH SMOOCH to people, especially hanzo
especially after barely a month of in game development
Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 04:13 am (UTC)(link)so, yeah, it's OOC and stupid, especially a month out.
Re: FUTUROLOGY
Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 06:08 am (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 06:11 am (UTC)(link)at least she doesn't front about it
Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 06:21 am (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 06:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 06:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 06:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 06:37 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 23:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 06:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 06:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
like I can't put my finger on specifics and I don't have anything against the canon in itself, but I'll admit that it salts my buns a little more than it should with how full up the game cap is right now and all the more interesting characters still waiting in the app queue
Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 12:14 pm (UTC)(link)otoh we have big casts like Fate or the Basaras that don't even try to pretend they aren't an insular circlejerk.
i'm glad the mods seem to be aware, i just wish there was more they could do.
Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 02:41 pm (UTC)(link)da
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 14:47 (UTC) - Expanddda
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 15:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: dda
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 15:43 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 15:45 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 15:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 00:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 00:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 00:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 04:27 pm (UTC)(link)sorry if this rustles your hornets, anon, but i bet these guys want to have fun more than they want to perform highly IC versions of characters you just admitted you don't know or care about. my god, i'm actually having trouble thinking of anything less important than whether same-canon characters are doing some shippy bullshit with each other in an RP game. just out of curiosity, which one of their dicks did you want your character to sit on?
da
(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 04:37 pm (UTC)(link)sa
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 16:40 (UTC) - Expandayrt
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 16:47 (UTC) - Expandayrt
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 16:52 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 20:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 00:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 00:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:01 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 03:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 03:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 03:09 (UTC) - Expanddda
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 03:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: dda
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 03:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: dda
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 03:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: dda
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 03:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 04:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 16:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 23:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-27 13:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-27 14:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 00:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 00:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:53 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 02:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 06:41 pm (UTC)(link)there are ooc ships as far as the eye can see in every game and i don't see what's special about this one
Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 18:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-26 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)but pretty much all overwatch ships have zero basis in canon with a few exceptions (jack/ana or jack/gabriel, maybe ana/gabriel) so i'd say get used to it once more of them start popping up in games.
Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-27 03:43 am (UTC)(link)Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-27 03:59 am (UTC)(link)Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-27 11:16 am (UTC)(link)Are we that scared of the Overwatch oocness?
Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-27 11:33 am (UTC)(link)what's your issue anon...I'm not quite following?
Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-27 12:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-27 12:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-27 14:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-27 14:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-27 02:57 pm (UTC)(link)i think it has more to do with the fact that we, you know, actually have casts now
as opposed to when the game started out with mostly LCWs
Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-29 01:27 am (UTC)(link)EITHER SHIT OR GET OFF THE POT
Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-29 01:34 am (UTC)(link)Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-29 03:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-29 19:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-29 05:02 am (UTC)(link)this is how the misery olympics happen between minorities and the gay community because one is always worse than the other!!!
either that or you're trying to shift goalposts and distract because i'd say good job because i hate these fucks and they're in every game, always
Re: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) - 2016-07-29 14:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: FUTUROLOGY
(Anonymous) 2016-07-29 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)