FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 04:07 am (UTC)(link)
http://flashbanging.dreamwidth.org/2100.html?thread=14900#cmt14900

so are hanzo and mccree supposed to be this rampagingly gay for each other or am i just missing something

i'm mostly canonblind outside a few quick plays but mccree really doesn't strike me as the type to go I DON'T WANNA BE FRIENDS I WANNA BE WITH YOU KISS KISS KISS SMOOCH SMOOCH to people, especially hanzo

especially after barely a month of in game development

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
they have absolutely ZERO connection in game, as far as I can tell, but they became a pet masc4masc ship among the fandom who are grossed out by old men.

so, yeah, it's OOC and stupid, especially a month out.

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 04:39 am (UTC)(link)
Somehow that was even worse than I expected. Wow.

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 06:08 am (UTC)(link)
It's really OOC on all fronts, even for a game with a lot of room for head canon. Not surprised at all since this is DW and it's these players though.

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 06:11 am (UTC)(link)
don't know about the other player but lyn has always been in it for the ooc bdsm yaoi

at least she doesn't front about it

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 06:21 am (UTC)(link)
lyn? and who are "these players"?

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 06:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 06:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 06:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 06:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 23:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 06:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 06:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 11:50 am (UTC)(link)
tbh I feel like almost all of this overwatch cast is a little lackluster...

like I can't put my finger on specifics and I don't have anything against the canon in itself, but I'll admit that it salts my buns a little more than it should with how full up the game cap is right now and all the more interesting characters still waiting in the app queue

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 12:14 pm (UTC)(link)
i can see how the big new shiny cast can be annoying, but imo at least the overwatches try to get involved with the game and tag out.

otoh we have big casts like Fate or the Basaras that don't even try to pretend they aren't an insular circlejerk.

i'm glad the mods seem to be aware, i just wish there was more they could do.

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 02:41 pm (UTC)(link)
probably because there just isn't that much canon personality for them to work with right now and characterization might have to change at the drop of a hat to remain ic. blizzard basically admitted they're making it all up as they go.

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 14:47 (UTC) - Expand

dda

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 15:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 15:43 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 15:45 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 15:50 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 00:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 00:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 00:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 04:27 pm (UTC)(link)
i would truly love to have dumb melodramatic yaois in my life.

sorry if this rustles your hornets, anon, but i bet these guys want to have fun more than they want to perform highly IC versions of characters you just admitted you don't know or care about. my god, i'm actually having trouble thinking of anything less important than whether same-canon characters are doing some shippy bullshit with each other in an RP game. just out of curiosity, which one of their dicks did you want your character to sit on?

da

(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 04:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Not in the game but even though it's one of the meanest things to do in this fandom-based hobby, my favorite wankgate moments are community wtf-ing over people's nonsensical ships. Like those terrible Steve/Bucky logs from Hadriel.

sa

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 16:40 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 16:47 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 16:52 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 20:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 00:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 00:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 03:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 03:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 03:09 (UTC) - Expand

dda

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 03:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 03:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 03:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 03:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 04:46 pm (UTC)(link)
i could care less who ships what but when players playing ooc adaptations of their characters are hogging spots in a capped game, it's something to be chafed about

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 16:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)
so which one are you

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 23:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-27 13:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-27 14:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 00:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 00:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 01:53 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-28 02:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 06:41 pm (UTC)(link)
it is cringeworthy but i honestly hope you found this because you were going to comment to the inbox, not because you were hoping to stir shit

there are ooc ships as far as the eye can see in every game and i don't see what's special about this one

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-25 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
ooc is still ooc, and this is stupidly ooc. i don't see why it should get a free pass just because it happens a lot in other places. play the character you apped, not some cockhungry yaoi abortion.

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-25 18:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-26 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)
hanzo and mccree never interact in the actual canon (which is the comics/movies/other supplementary material, not the game itself), it's literally a ship born out of "they're hot so they're fucking" with a chemistry that's 100% made up. it happening gradually over time could make sense, it happening after a month? nah. someone just wants to get their yaoi on and couldn't be assed to keep it to memes and museboxes.

but pretty much all overwatch ships have zero basis in canon with a few exceptions (jack/ana or jack/gabriel, maybe ana/gabriel) so i'd say get used to it once more of them start popping up in games.

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-27 03:43 am (UTC)(link)
ugh is this the hanzo that just apped to thisavrou

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-27 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
i think it's the same mccree that apped, too. lol.

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-27 11:16 am (UTC)(link)
Unrelated to the doc yaoishit but what's the point of changing AC to make characters interact with each other if they weren't gonna wait for AC anyway before reducing the cap from 8 to 6?

Are we that scared of the Overwatch oocness?

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-27 11:33 am (UTC)(link)
well i mean, all casts are still below the cap rn and the game cap is still full up so nobody new's come in yet

what's your issue anon...I'm not quite following?

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-27 12:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-27 12:55 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-27 14:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-27 14:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-27 02:57 pm (UTC)(link)
8 characters is 10% of the game

i think it has more to do with the fact that we, you know, actually have casts now

as opposed to when the game started out with mostly LCWs

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-29 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
I'm less concerned at the moment about characters playing their yaois together than I am about the players who are taking their third hiatus on and off in a row who've been in game longer than me but who I've seen in maybe one thread.

EITHER SHIT OR GET OFF THE POT

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-29 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
it surprises me how often riza is listed as a "favorite" when she's barely around for this reason. where is she even threading?

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-29 03:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-29 19:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-29 05:02 am (UTC)(link)
you can be pissed about two things at once and not go well this thing is worse

this is how the misery olympics happen between minorities and the gay community because one is always worse than the other!!!

either that or you're trying to shift goalposts and distract because i'd say good job because i hate these fucks and they're in every game, always

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) - 2016-07-29 14:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: FUTUROLOGY

(Anonymous) 2016-07-29 02:05 pm (UTC)(link)
name and shame