Re: NAMEDROPPING

(Anonymous) 2016-10-01 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I fuckin saw that freak selwyn on a meme again, I want to weep

how did I know it was selwyn? ALL THE EXCLAMATION POINTS and creepy ((ooc)) conversations before the actually tag

Re: NAMEDROPPING

(Anonymous) 2016-10-01 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)
*they

Re: NAMEDROPPING

(Anonymous) 2016-10-01 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)
i hope you told the mods

Re: NAMEDROPPING

(Anonymous) 2016-10-01 06:39 pm (UTC)(link)
then report them, you baby

Re: NAMEDROPPING

(Anonymous) 2016-10-01 06:42 pm (UTC)(link)
I got u anon, doing it now

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-10-01 07:05 pm (UTC)(link)
you're doing good work

Re: NAMEDROPPING

(Anonymous) 2016-10-01 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)
And link us to it please.

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-10-03 03:53 pm (UTC)(link)
we have a right to know

Re: NAMEDROPPING

(Anonymous) 2016-10-01 07:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Wait, is it bad to have ooc conversations before a thread? It seemed to be fairly common last time I looked over a meme.

Re: NAMEDROPPING

(Anonymous) 2016-10-01 07:58 pm (UTC)(link)
it's her style that gives her away, and in general, no, ooc convos are pretty much fine. but go google selwyn and wankgate and you'll probably get links to some of her stuff and you can see what they mean. she is incredibly annoying to just read.

Re: NAMEDROPPING

(Anonymous) 2016-10-01 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)
let's be honest, bakerstreet is a public comm, and anyone can read that shit. if you're going to hash out smut or some wacko thread idea, in my opinion, take it to a muse box - maybe I'm paranoid, but I just find it more tasteful to take ooc discussion outside of a public forum. It makes all parties feel more comfortable, and that's a thing with RP.

Re: NAMEDROPPING

(Anonymous) 2016-10-01 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)
okay, but that's your personal opinion and yeah, you might be a bit paranoid. i mean, if you want to pm, pm, but it's not an expectation. not everyone cares as much about it as you seem to. it's why they play in 'public' in the first place. otherwise everything might as well be done in private or a musebox.

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-10-03 04:23 pm (UTC)(link)
this place is as bad as tumblr when it comes to expecting other people to make this a 'safe place' for you

Re: NAMEDROPPING

(Anonymous) 2016-10-01 09:12 pm (UTC)(link)
is selwyn "dorkvader"? i noticed that their auror account gives access and they replied to me yesterday, so i'm a bit :/ but i'm not even sure if it's her and i don't want to alienate a random rper for no reason

Re: NAMEDROPPING

(Anonymous) 2016-10-01 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)
no, it's someone else, we have a mutual plurk friend. idr who it is, but definitely not selwyn.

Re: NAMEDROPPING

(Anonymous) 2016-10-02 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
Absolutely not. I know that player and they are actually very cool. They are not connected to Selwyn at all.

dorkvader is safe and fun.

Re: NAMEDROPPING

(Anonymous) 2016-10-02 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
dorkvader is safe. fun is seriously pushing it.

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-10-02 04:32 am (UTC)(link)
Safe but cringey. Ive stopped top-leveling my SW characters because of them

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2016-10-03 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
and nothing of value was lost

-1

(Anonymous) 2016-10-08 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
what the above anon said, you baby