i feel the need to point out that the other anon paraphrased it and it's not a direct quote from the mods, just in case someone actually thinks otherwise. however i do wish they had said it like that word for word.
Here's the actual revision request, then. Not as snarky as the paraphrase obviously, but when you look at the other ones which request to follow word limits, expand on relationships, or nerf weapons, it does stand out:
The personality, as written, does not flow naturally; it provides us only basic information, stating simplistic facts with marginal insight as to how the character actually behaves. More canon support and dialogue are needed to round out this section.
We are aware this character has minimal canon to draw from. Bearing the above in mind, if sufficient inference cannot reasonably be made from existing material, then we unfortunately cannot accept an application for them at this time.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
anonsitting) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
wankgate2016-10-01 09:49 pm
da
(Anonymous) 2016-10-06 12:21 pm (UTC)(link)NAYRT
(Anonymous) 2016-10-06 04:04 pm (UTC)(link)The personality, as written, does not flow naturally; it provides us only basic information, stating simplistic facts with marginal insight as to how the character actually behaves. More canon support and dialogue are needed to round out this section.
We are aware this character has minimal canon to draw from. Bearing the above in mind, if sufficient inference cannot reasonably be made from existing material, then we unfortunately cannot accept an application for them at this time.