so what you're saying is had this person not asked, all of this would have blown over and janson or whatever would have gotten away with being a fuckhead, so we have to go after the person that asked about it, not the fuckhead.
btw you're incredibly obvious in flatview. all of the objecting comments sound the same and come within seconds/minutes of each other. it makes it look like you've got an axe to grind, not some uninvolved third party shaming someone you think did an honest wrongdoing.
and? i'm sure a lot of anons are "incredibly obvious" on basic bitch flatview. congrats on noticing timestamps. i'm glad you're able to read.
i'm not an "uninvolved third party". i never said i was. but it's pretty obvious to me a lot of the people in this thread are involved with margot because why would all of you keep insisting "margot did nothing wrong". margot is not some innocent in this situation and only the "friends" wedged up her ass could try and claim she is. repeatedly.
that's a shame because i think jansen is a shithead as much as i think margot is a bitch. i don't see why i have to stan for either one of them when i hate both of them pretty equally.
not everything is a big conspiracy, anon. there's just no wrongdoing here. you're succumbing to that "yeah i bet that bitch eats salad" mentality where you see someone you dislike greatly for some reason doing anything and read malice in it, even if there is none.
dda
(Anonymous) 2018-10-15 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)am i leaving anything out here?
sa
(Anonymous) 2018-10-15 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2018-10-15 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)+2
(Anonymous) 2018-10-15 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: +2
(Anonymous) 2018-10-16 01:52 am (UTC)(link)+3
(Anonymous) 2018-10-15 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)which is hilarious in retrospect considering the whole spiel of le uninvolved third party being spouted
+4
(Anonymous) 2018-10-16 12:04 am (UTC)(link)Re: +4
Re: +4
(Anonymous) 2018-10-16 12:08 am (UTC)(link)Re: +4
Re: sa
(Anonymous) 2018-10-16 12:27 am (UTC)(link)i'm not an "uninvolved third party". i never said i was. but it's pretty obvious to me a lot of the people in this thread are involved with margot because why would all of you keep insisting "margot did nothing wrong". margot is not some innocent in this situation and only the "friends" wedged up her ass could try and claim she is. repeatedly.
Re: sa
also you come across as a jansen whiteknight for all that you're trying to make people here look like margot's friends
Re: sa
ps cordell says you walk bowlegged
Re: sa
is this a tv show reference
Re: sa
(Anonymous) - 2018-10-16 01:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) - 2018-10-16 02:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) - 2018-10-16 02:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) - 2018-10-16 03:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) - 2018-10-16 04:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) 2018-10-16 01:32 am (UTC)(link)Re: sa
(Anonymous) 2018-10-16 02:05 am (UTC)(link)also "i wouldn't call her a problematic bitch" =/= stan
Re: sa
(Anonymous) - 2018-10-16 02:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) - 2018-10-16 04:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: sa
(Anonymous) 2018-10-16 01:52 am (UTC)(link)Re: dda
and since you're looking at this on flatview, yes. it's me. the same anon. you fuckhead.
Re: dda
but now i'm curious, why is jansen a fuckhead
and why isn't steph one
Re: dda
Re: dda
Re: dda
(Anonymous) 2018-10-16 12:03 pm (UTC)(link)Re: dda
(Anonymous) 2018-10-16 01:05 pm (UTC)(link)Re: dda
(Anonymous) 2018-10-16 02:11 pm (UTC)(link)Re: dda
(Anonymous) 2018-10-16 03:51 pm (UTC)(link)