Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
lmao when they're like:

HOW DARE YOU SHIP AGE GAPS OR TOXIC RELATIONSHIPS IN






JOJO'S BIZARRE ADVENTURE!!!!!!!!

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 03:55 am (UTC)(link)
as a former jojo, that was precisely the canon i was thinking of

like if that's such an issue for you why are you here when jojo as a canon has way trashier than the output of most fanartists

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 03:59 am (UTC)(link)
seriously lmao. jojo's is the one I think of first too but I've even seen it with really fucking problematic shit like devilman. I just don't know why they watch/read the canons to begin with when every single thing about it is apparently a trigger to them

(the secret is that they like the problematic stuff, they just don't like other people enjoying things either without them or being better (at fanart or writing) than they are aka getting more attention than they do.)

-1

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)
The person op described reads more like someone who cant share

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 05:44 pm (UTC)(link)
specifically with "problematic" members with "problematic" ships

it's the exact same playbook, anon

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 05:46 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah idk why ayrt doesn't think these things are wholly separate. the venn diagram is usually a circle

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 06:26 pm (UTC)(link)
The ‘problematic’ player with the ‘problematic’ ship isnt as toxic as the person trying to ‘claim’ the fandom for themselves

+1

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 06:45 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, what??? since when do people who like ~problematic~ shit = people who can't share fandom with others

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 06:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Read the top level it’s about someone who is a fandom with a problematic person *not* being able to share said fandom with problematic person

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 07:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Word. You cant tell others what fandoms they like or dont - unless you are in Soviet Russia

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Or regular Russia, to be fair.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
who said this

seriously, where did you read this in this thread

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 08:54 pm (UTC)(link)
this just in, stupids

two things can be toxic at the same time

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Problematic person is debatable given we cant all like each but there is no excuse for trying to bully anyone out of something they enjoy problematic person or not the person trying to bully someone out of a fandom is always worse

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)
NAME DROP NAME DROP

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 10:21 pm (UTC)(link)
jesse

what the fuck are you talking about

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
or they feel guilty about liking the thing and feel they have to be a performative "good person"

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Op please out this person theres no room in any fandom for those who can’t share any fandom

+1

(Anonymous) 2022-03-05 04:23 pm (UTC)(link)
This! These are the toxic people of fandom