Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
pointing out misinformation is valid

pointing it out 500 different times is unnecessary and yes, does start looking defensive when you're not adding anything to the discussion other than performative HOW VERY DARE!!! reactions, as if this person ran over your dog as opposed to just having a dumb take on wg

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 03:43 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt

this kind of response to bad takes happens all the time on wankgate tho

why does this specific dogpile get you up in arms

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
nobody's up in arms the dogpilers just look obnoxious and aren't helping the rep jigoku already has for having whiteknights

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
but again

dogpiling is normal on wankgate, it’s wankgate, you can’t even be sure most of the people responding are in the game

tbqh too none of the comments to that comment looked defensive of the game as “mods shouldn’t have to spoonfeed plot” debate is a pretty common debate around here

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
better that they do it here than in my game

go ahead. protect the honor of your precious game

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 05:29 am (UTC)(link)
you're pretty sensitive if this seems out of the ordinary to you.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 05:36 am (UTC)(link)
it doesn't

it's still obnoxious

as is the nature of wankgate, people making the things they enjoy seem oversensitive and overinvested

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 10:15 am (UTC)(link)
log off