Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 12:32 pm (UTC)(link)
stg i don't get what happened. is this how it happened:

a blocked b.

a tagged in c's post which is all about b.

c told a to not tag for b's sake.

a complained on rpanons and anons ask? a and b and c log in and that's how this wank exploded?

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 12:44 pm (UTC)(link)
https://rpanons.dreamwidth.org/89104.html?thread=264485904#cmt264485904

you can just look at the thread on rpanons. this started with vague posting about A.

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 12:49 pm (UTC)(link)
the geralt trying. bless their heart.

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 01:14 pm (UTC)(link)
the geralt is the dave player lmao, they probably started the thread

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 01:46 pm (UTC)(link)
when i saw that geralt's comment i wondered if they were really that dense

now i get the people who were both sidesing it

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:08 pm (UTC)(link)
knowing the geralt was megan logging in fishing for pastebins before anyone had even named the game or confirmed the identity of the player sure adds a whole new new perspective, huh

sa

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:09 pm (UTC)(link)
NEW new smh my bad

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:15 pm (UTC)(link)
y'all really didn't see this from the beginning? wow no wonder this went down the way it did

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:19 pm (UTC)(link)
they probably planned out how they would reply and bait the thread to make it go the way they wanted. wouldn't be surprised if there were some sameanon threads in there

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:25 pm (UTC)(link)
lol i doubt that, no one has to spin any nefarious plots to turn anoncomms into a hovel of shit-flinging apes. we do that on our own.

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Anon, any one who saw the plurk a week or so ago knew what game that thread was about.

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 14:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 15:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 15:04 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 15:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 15:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 15:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 15:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 15:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 17:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 18:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 18:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 15:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 15:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:19 pm (UTC)(link)
sure does. the blocking player seems weird and obtuse, but knowing this the homestucks just look like oversensitive babies making a huge mountain out of a molehill. it's obvious to anyone with half a brain cell that an idiom used in frustration isn't actually a violent threat, and i'm pretty sure the dave/geralt player has half a brain cell, so they were intending to scream in the mods' ears in bad faith about someone being ~violent~

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:06 pm (UTC)(link)
"If anyone has any proof of this could you please DM me or the mods? I would like to report it."

aka

"I can't see her plurk and I want the juicy deets so I can keep dragging this wank out for as long as possible."

what a scumbag and drama hungry bitch, I hope they all get banned from Noct

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:19 pm (UTC)(link)
nobody had even mentioned noct at the point megan logged in asking for pastebins so either she posted the original vague and knew who it was about or she just really wanted an excuse to go to the mods

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:44 pm (UTC)(link)
the 'deets' were obvs bee's bitchery lmao. megan was itching to do something and hopped on at the ref to her her her.

tbh megan and bee are stealth megawankers and it was a matter of time before they were at each other's throats. i say let them fight.

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 14:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 14:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 15:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 14:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) - 2022-04-11 15:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
People were wanking on this all weekend and only now does someone point this out? I didn't think the Dave showed up until after the weird OTT monologue. Completely changes how I look at the situation.

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 12:53 pm (UTC)(link)
i need to know who the op is. do they know what the fuck they unleashed on us.

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:07 pm (UTC)(link)
pretty obviously the Dave player anon. they were probably in that thread anon + logged in the whole time

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:23 pm (UTC)(link)
wait so we're going to turn our vitriol and frothing rage at megan now?

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:24 pm (UTC)(link)
no we're both sidesing because no one likes anyone involved, keep up

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:27 pm (UTC)(link)
when will it be john player's turn tho. this needs to be equal both sidesing.

+1

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)
the regular scheduled shitting on bee is over for now. we dunk on megan's obvious ass for the time being.

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:27 pm (UTC)(link)
yes

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:27 pm (UTC)(link)
the other side of the debate has gone to bed

Re: NOCTIUM

(Anonymous) 2022-04-11 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)
a complained on plurk, all of this having elapsed weeks(?) ago

it was resolved privately for the most part

then someone complained anon on rpa about a blocking people and it got splooged all over anoncomms