Ryan Gosling (
ryanongosling) wrote in
wankgate2022-02-14 02:55 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
239: how does one become popular on dreamwidth rp?

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.
Keep the rules in mind.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
Re: Megan
(Anonymous) 2022-04-12 12:31 am (UTC)(link)Can I use a PB?
For OCs or canons with limited or unavailable visuals (such as novels or comic books with difficult-to-find digital scans), PBs are fine. It's also acceptable for malleable protagonists with customizable appearances (such as Mass Effect), as we understand that not everyone has access to resources that allow screencapping of their characters (or the visuals are severely limited, such as first-person gameplay). Fanart and commissions are also sufficient alternatives, as well as some additional "special" icons (i.e. pets, animal forms, morphs, et cetera).
Non-humans are not required to be humanized for the setting, however, so we would prefer to leave their physical appearance intact. Additionally, we would rather players do not substitute a PB for a character with already available visuals. For example, we would allow use of a PB for younger/older versions of Harry Potter characters or make exceptions if you are intending to play strictly from the books than the movies, but we will discourage anyone from drastically altering a character's canon appearance by using a PB, especially if that character has plenty of screentime and visuals in their canon.
And the facetwin thing is easily mitigated enough by saying "I don't want to play facetwin mechanics." If the other person pushes that it's a different issue.
Re: Megan
(Anonymous) 2022-04-12 12:35 am (UTC)(link)Re: Megan
(Anonymous) 2022-04-12 12:40 am (UTC)(link)Re: Megan
(Anonymous) 2022-04-12 12:43 am (UTC)(link)eg, look at shadow and bone/grishaverse. the book descriptions are wildly different for some of the characters that were cast in the series. don't get me started on the racism aspect when the shows wrote for inclusivity of cast and the books have a very different aesthetic that doesn't line up, so it'd be kind of a dick move to call someone a racist if they went with a book fitting pb for the main char instead of the poc visual cast.
Re: Megan
(Anonymous) 2022-04-12 03:20 am (UTC)(link)Re: Megan
(Anonymous) 2022-04-12 03:42 am (UTC)(link)Re: Megan
(Anonymous) 2022-04-12 05:55 am (UTC)(link)it was dumb but everyone involved seems to be over it now so it was really stupid for anon to bring it up.