Ryan Gosling (
ryanongosling) wrote in
wankgate2022-09-01 09:26 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
242: what kind of feet do you like?

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.
Keep the rules in mind.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-02 06:09 am (UTC)(link)Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-03 08:10 pm (UTC)(link)has there ever been a player suggestion that wasn't stonewalled by this team? asking them anything is like talking to a brick wall. the suggestion was for tdms to remain lighter and allow space for more involved bimonthly events so it doesn't seem like they even read it properly before throwing out a nope. i can't buy the line that 6 events a year would be limiting for what they want to do when this game has been running at zero metaplot for at least eighteen months and to my knowledge has never had any plot that influenced events for more than 3 months. let's not pretend there's some grand scheme now.
Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-03 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)having a game event every other month would slow things down considerably unless the game events are huge (which they won't be let's be honest). maintaining a game doesn't mean slowing down the entire game to let the slowest players catch up, that's how games die.
to be honest if you can't keep up with events then you need to learn to establish boundaries. i see lots of players on my timeline trying to do every single thing in the game and that's impossible, it's not the mods' fault if you can't regulate your experience.
Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-03 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-03 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)also although i agree events have been lackluster lately i think it's disingenuous to say that they're all sol fluff with aphro. lots of players took advantage of the bodyswap and nightmares event to do dark and violent plots for instance.
Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-04 07:03 am (UTC)(link)People here who are trying to make it about the players and their fomo are missing the point. The mods are trying to feed us a glut of low nutrient candy and potato chips, pretending it keeps everyone full just by the sheer volume of it.
Players are trying to ask for some high quality, slow-cooked meat that they can sink their teeth into, and they're just trying to find a way to communicate that with the most stubborn and antagonistic mod team in all of DWRP.
So they try to say hey, we see you're struggling to keep your heads above water and feeding us so much candy, but it would be ok for us to have less volume if we could have some more meat instead. And then they try to reassure that they really do need less by saying hey actually what we get now is almost too much.
And of course that opens the door for the mods to be like well then just don't eat it all! While they keep shoving low value junk food and don't change anything.
The most absurd line in their whole answer is that only six mod events per year would be very limiting FOR THEM and what THEY want to do.
1) They don't DO ANYTHING with the events or the setting and they haven't for at least the last year+. They can't even seem to remember half of what's in the setting most of the time, let alone what's been established in previous events. Nothing impactful can or will ever happen because they want (and have said they want) a completely static and unchanging setting in which characters can't do anything but react to the infrastructure. So what the fuck do they want to do that they would be so limited from??
2) Why are they so much more concerned about what THEY would like to do than what THEIR PLAYERS would like to do? People like to say "oh it's the mods' game" but if they didn't have players then they wouldn't be getting to do anything at all as mods. If they're worried about the healthy pace of the game, then they ought to be more concerned about whether they're just creating a critical mass of frustration and wearing down the very last traces of good will the players have for them, which amazingly does still exist despite their constantly hostile naysaying attitude.
3) Then they go on to say that fewer events would create more pressure because players would have higher expectations. I honestly cannot believe they flat out admitted this. They actually admitted that they don't want to have to deal with the pressure of writing more substantive and meaty events and that they WANT player expectations to be in the shitter because hey, you can't be surprised at being disappointed if you know you're ALWAYS disappointed, I guess?? That sure is a race to the bottom choice right there. But it circles right back to point 1, about what they supposedly "want to do" that they would be too "limited" from with only six events per year.
They want to do so much! For themselves, while keeping no pressure to do it, and no expectations that it will be any good, and no troublesome requests from pesky players who want them to do deliver on their promises, or who want to do stuff, which is all very pressuring for them, so go away. But don't worry guys, they're still really passionate about running this game!
Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-04 07:18 am (UTC)(link)this screed is exactly why we have trouble finding decent mods around here, because no one wants to deal with this attitude. the entitlement from you in this comment because the mods said they don't want to break their backs for more bitching is wild.
Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-04 07:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-04 12:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-04 19:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-04 10:20 am (UTC)(link)if you don't like it and you're so resentful that you're willing to write a whole essay about it, maybe it's time for you to realise that this isn't the right game for you any more and you should drop
Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-04 12:09 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 14:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 15:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 15:37 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 16:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 16:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 16:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 16:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 17:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 18:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 18:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 19:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 19:43 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 20:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 18:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 17:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-08 05:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-08 07:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 16:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 16:11 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 18:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-08 10:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-08 11:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-08 12:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-08 12:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 22:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-08 11:04 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-08 13:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-08 14:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-08 16:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-08 16:43 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-08 16:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) - 2022-09-07 15:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-04 12:57 am (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2022-09-04 05:10 am (UTC)(link)Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-05 06:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-10 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-11 12:22 am (UTC)(link)sure it could be a coincidence but seems doubtful
Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-11 12:25 am (UTC)(link)Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-11 08:43 am (UTC)(link)Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-11 11:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-09-13 12:05 am (UTC)(link)Now they just need a plot that explodes in bad communication so much that the whole thing collapses under its own weight in the next three months.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-09-13 12:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-09-13 12:21 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-09-13 12:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-09-16 05:30 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-24 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)i get that they're having a hard time but they're making more work for themselves at this point
Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-25 02:37 am (UTC)(link)Re: DUPLICITY
(Anonymous) 2022-09-27 01:08 am (UTC)(link)your answer is lurking in here