242: what kind of feet do you like?

[ryanongosling]

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.

Keep the rules in mind.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves

Report stupid shit here.

Comments

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

what about this is hearsay

please specify in detail

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

That any of the anons here actually play in the game? Mods can't and won't act unless their own players bring the issue to them.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

you are so stupid. you are really dumb, for real.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

"Unless they bring it to us directly we're not touching it" is a common mod policy

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CSCI-C1N_o

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

if you want an easy out it is, sure

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

can't act unless players being it to mods

players can't bring it to mods because the mods are gsai

checkmate, cucks

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

said it last post and i'll say it again

sock accounts are right over there

anyone used one yet?

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

wheres the personal responsibility from gonsai and the jgk mods tho

where is the gonsai apology and the mods showing either that gonsai is not going to have access to mods accts anymore, or publicly admitting that gonsai is a mod with access to the mod accounts

why are you constantly, incessantly, gonsaishly insisting that gonsai lying and fucking up is a problem other people have to solve with sufficiently proactive earnestness and there are no other available solutions

no argument that people who object ought to object and let gonsai stalk and harass them and shit on them on wg with his endless eternal never-stopping hours of being on wankgate, which you know, because you are here, as part of those hours. of course people just need to take those lumps because they apped into a game where gonsai was a mod and they had no way to know it. they deserve to expose themselves to risk, that is the appropriate price of not wanting to play with gonsai.

but at what point are you ever going to evince an interest in what gonsai, who is the sole actual source of all this drama, does?

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

im not saying gsai doesnt bear personal responsibility, anon

im saying theyre never going to own up to it if you dont shove their nose into the big smelly turd theyve been laying for months

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

oh right

because the problem all this time

has been that gonsai is unaware of the complaints their presence has caused and would cause much more intensely if their status as a mod was known

they had no way of knowing this was even an issue

definitely, the way to solidify the community's objections to his fraud and misrepresentation is to

submit sock account complaints to the mod inbox of the game they control

* their fraud

[(Anonymous)]

uguu

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

im suggesting current players submit sock accounts to the current public feedback post if it allows for it

not the mod inbox

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

pedantry is no substitute for accountability

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

idk what this has to do with what im saying but cheers i'll drink to that bro

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

yeah let's sock up and drop complaints about gsai in the mod inbox

the mod inbox gsai has access to

there is no flaw in this logic whatsoever

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt actually already identified the other flaw in this logic, which is that mods wouldn't take complaints from people not in the game. so socks are a non-starter! just like "submitting a complaint to the mods, but not to gonsai" is also not an available option.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

feedback post is there, whether itll accept non-members is another matter

it will probably get screened but if it does then we have our answer. that's as good of a response as any

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

jw what does that prove except that the mods screened a weird comment

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

if you consider "hey i think you should address this, here is a picture of the screencap of the thing im talking about" to be a "weird comment" then nobody here can help you

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

i have good news for you, anon






doing stuff like this with no recourse for the other party is the literal point of sock accounts

you could make a burner with no connection to your identity. whats gsai gonna do, stalk new dw user suitcaseoffarts69?

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

exactly. sock it up, post the deets to the mod feedback page, screencap the comment to prove that you posted it, and then wait to see what the mods do. if the mods do nothing, then come back here and post the screencap of your comment saying 'hey i posted this concern to the mods and they totally ignored it.'

if i had any sort of proof of a player behaving badly that's exactly what i would do. the fact that not a single person seems to be willing to do that in this situation is pretty telling, especially after the whole luc thing where people actually did come forward with pastebins to show that all of the claims were in fact true.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

there are no present day deets to take to the mods that aren't "hey did you know that person is on your mod team" so that's probably why

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

the rpanons ban for constantly stirring shit is present day

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

[(Anonymous)]

i am begging you to read the thread you're posting in before doing so

the rpanons ban is not ancient history and trying to downplay it as such just makes you look oblivious at best and illiterate at worst