Re: JIGOKU-CHO

(Anonymous) 2022-09-05 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm not sure if you should disable replies, because if anyone else wants to come forward with any kind of evidence or discussion, they won't be able to, at least not without making another plurk of their own which might feel excessive. i know the anon plurk about ryslig devolved into spam, but it doesn't help that OP didn't bring anything constructive to the table beyond basically "so how about that ryslig lately, amirite?" and nothing else.

if memory serves, the plurks about lifeaftr and jamie went down a lot different because the OPs of those immediately came forward with constructive deets of their experience that made it hard to do so without looking petty.

it's really up to you if you decide to enable replies, but those are my two cents. at the very least the plurk itself can't be anonymous so people can pp you with deets they want you to share.

+1

(Anonymous) 2022-09-05 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
this is definitely a situation where there's strength in numbers. gsai might be able to snipe someone on a game hmd or ignore them in the mod inbox, but with multiple names attached to deets? they can't go after everyone, and even if they did, it would be incredibly obvious.

it only takes one person to start a chain reaction. and i doubt you'd be alone, because this asshole has burned plenty of bridges in the past.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

(Anonymous) 2022-09-05 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
What is their experience that will keep this from looking petty, considering it already looks petty and it hasn't seen the light of day yet? Finding out you're in a game you can drop any time? Thinking the discord is annoying?

You don't have to link the same old thread again it's ok.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

(Anonymous) 2022-09-05 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
oh that's easy, it's "gonsai intentionally lied to everyone to start a game and shadowmod it without revealing his involvement, as he knew people would not want to play in the game if they knew he was modding it, especially the people who had opted out of playing with him."

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

(Anonymous) 2022-09-08 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
think what's wild is in the pastebin he acknowledges people wouldn't want to be in a game modded by him and then he mods it anyway? he's not even ignorant of why people would be wary of him running a game.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

(Anonymous) 2022-09-05 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
give it a rest already gsai

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

(Anonymous) 2022-09-08 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
gsai just take the l already, it's over, the jig is up, we all know the truth now

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

(Anonymous) 2022-09-08 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
for fuck's sake