Re: JIGOKU-CHO

(Anonymous) 2022-09-30 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
gonsai casually online and just chilling :) bee's probably off putting ice packs on their ego. that leaves min to clean up the mess and be their fall guy i guess.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
the only official mod response since the critique started getting harsh is a typo correction

my sides

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
They posted on Plurk saying they’re putting together a response

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 02:01 am (UTC)(link)
pretty sure their response will be more hand wringing about how it's the players' fault and not theirs

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
I'm worried about the mods saying something because I don't trust them to not target certain players that spoke up.

You can see what they told the Hizen player in private. They tried to make the player look like the bad guy in the end.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
yeah. gonsai's tried to stir shit on players who've crossed them in the past and misdirect attention to get the heat off them. if wank gets posted in the future that just so happens to involve the people being vocal on the feedback, don't fucking fall for it.

Re: JIGOKU-CHO

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 06:19 am (UTC)(link)
People didn't really read too hard into the tone of how the mods responded to Hizen mun compiling the responses by the mods to plot questions into an ooc post (there was wank instead on the ethics of it for some reason), but it really does come off as passive agressive in hindsight, like they didn't want the mun to do that.