Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 04:15 pm (UTC)(link)
not the anon who said they were

just think 'x was bad so y can't be' is asinine logic for stupid children

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 04:16 pm (UTC)(link)
jumping into conversations when nobody asked your opinion is also the asinine behaviour of stupid children

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 04:17 pm (UTC)(link)
80% of wankgate is people giving unsolicited feedback to situations that only tangentially involve them and thats being generous

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)
and?

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 05:54 pm (UTC)(link)
and i love to hear the sound of my own voice

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 05:52 pm (UTC)(link)
no one said y can't be

+1

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 05:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Automatically going "well actually y is bad too" with nothing to back it up is also dumb kid logic.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)
gonsai and dumb kid logic go hand in hand

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 06:10 pm (UTC)(link)
the mods of the game in question were clearly and provably bad by every metric

someone busting in saying "HYPOTHETICALLY, some of the players COULD also POSSIBLY have been bad!" is completely irrelevant unless, you know, there were any players that were bad that contributed to the wankplosion which would require, you know, examples

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 06:18 pm (UTC)(link)
gsai and pals are absolutely going to try and rewrite this whole thing as bad/dumb/lazy/entitled players when the playerbase 1000% gave them every opportunity and warning to course correct months before the explosion

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 06:28 pm (UTC)(link)
exactly. so far every example of 'bad players' have been 1) the mods themselves being bad players and 2) the mods' friends, which doesn't really help the 'the players also contributed to the wanksplosion' in the way the person who started this seemed to be getting to

and if a player were bad enough to have somehow contributed to the wanksplosion (which makes no sense given that 100% of the issues have been mod-related) we'd have heard by now. most typical 'bad player' behavior would have been nothing more than a fart in the jigo tornado.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 06:35 pm (UTC)(link)
And sadly there will be clowns who agree to join their circus

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)
gsai and pals*

*tools