Ryan Gosling (
ryanongosling) wrote in
wankgate2022-09-01 09:26 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
242: what kind of feet do you like?

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.
Keep the rules in mind.
LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report stupid shit here.
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 04:15 pm (UTC)(link)just think 'x was bad so y can't be' is asinine logic for stupid children
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 04:16 pm (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 04:17 pm (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 05:54 pm (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 05:52 pm (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 05:56 pm (UTC)(link)Re: +1
(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 06:00 pm (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 06:10 pm (UTC)(link)someone busting in saying "HYPOTHETICALLY, some of the players COULD also POSSIBLY have been bad!" is completely irrelevant unless, you know, there were any players that were bad that contributed to the wankplosion which would require, you know, examples
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 06:18 pm (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 06:28 pm (UTC)(link)and if a player were bad enough to have somehow contributed to the wanksplosion (which makes no sense given that 100% of the issues have been mod-related) we'd have heard by now. most typical 'bad player' behavior would have been nothing more than a fart in the jigo tornado.
Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 06:35 pm (UTC)(link)Re: PLURK PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2022-10-05 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)*tools