ryanongosling: (Default)
Ryan Gosling ([personal profile] ryanongosling) wrote in [community profile] wankgate2024-02-10 10:47 pm

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-02-21 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
so pressure randos on the internet to be unpaid therapists in their place, got it

(Anonymous) 2024-02-21 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)
pedo is only one hard r away from pedro

coincidence??

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2024-02-21 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
ic/ooc bleed is always the first casualty of social media brainrot

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2024-02-21 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)
well wankgate brainrot usually results in the same thing but ~ironic~ so ymmv

i dont actually consider that much better

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
nah man, before i quit twitter i had former friends and acquaintances on there who galaxy brained themselves into literally agreeing with tucker carlson and calling fascist takes leftist

there's some dumb people on wg but there's only one or two actual chuds, self-aware or no

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
youre not going to convince me that pretending to be a chud is distantly above actually being one, anon

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
if your friends are agreeing with tucker carlson now, they weren't as leftist as you thought they were before

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
i have a feeling you're making the common pessimist mistake of assuming that if there are a lot of stupid comments they're made by many separate stupid people as opposed to a small number of no-jobs

(frozen comment) Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
ok

this is irrelevant to my opinion

(frozen comment) ayrt

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
it's a little of column a, little of column b tbqh. i thought back and in retrospect some of them had said some weirdly off things while also espousing progressive views, but some of them were 100% progressive but got into the idea of having a "community" where the community is basically progressives who go full flat earth about politics and wind up conspiracy theorists nationalists or something

i used to think it was that old truism about some people becoming more conservative with age, but i noticed it happened to literally nobody i knew who didn't squat on twitter all day long

(frozen comment) Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
ok buddy just because it's dying doesn't mean you need try to fire it back up with your trolling

Re: takes so hot, they'd get you run out of dwrp if your name was attached

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
if i don't like what my series did to my character, i'm going to cherry pick the parts i like and ignore the stuff i don't

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
see, i stop short of calling anything like that canon simply because i've run into situations where something i thought was clearly implied by canon turned out not to be the case after all/to be a red herring/etc. it's the sort of thing that can cause problems if you state it as being fact on an app, so i always just make very clear that while it's heavily implied by canon, it is not in fact official canon just so no one can point fingers at me if something comes out later to contradict it.

(frozen comment) ayrt

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 02:07 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, that makes a lot of sense! I was thinking more of long-standing canons where it's been implied long enough to assume it, but yeah red herrings are a thing.

(frozen comment) ayrt

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
i have friends who used to play from pandora hearts and got me into it so i still have trauma over things suddenly being turned completely upside down mid-canon, lol. i have learned my lesson about making assumptions!

(frozen comment) Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
i hope you realize that the main problem with all of this is the word being used. it's an incorrect term, transphobia. same with homophobia. the phobia aspect slams a lot more connotation to it than it should hold. not liking something doesn't make you phobic of it. neither does disagreeing with it. or just 'not feeling it'. all of that is suddenly slapped with a word that makes it a much bigger thing than it is, and imo, that's the problem. "i don't want to date/sleep with a transwoman who doesn't want to go through gender reassignment surgery because i'm a lesbian/cis straight male who doesn't engage with penises. that doesn't make me phobic of penises. i just don't want to involve any other than my own/none at all in my sexual activities." that shouldn't be a hot take or a gotcha used by bad faith actors who just want to scream about how they're being repressed because the person whose genitals they want to touch doesn't want to touch the genitals they have.

it's not transphobia to not agree or not want to interact, and i wish to fucking christ that in this pedantic day and age of 'wOrDs mAtTeR!!11!', those terms would be clarified and changed to something different. i'm tired of the argument going in circles when someone says something, the accusation of phobia is hurled, and then the argument devolves from there into they're not phobic, they just (insert thing here). it's a valid argument but as there's no other term aside from intolerance and bigotry which also don't necessarily align either in certain scenarios, it's just this circle of hell of circular arguments.

(frozen comment) Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
all very logical and well reasoned but you're never gonna convince cultists with reason. they know in their heart of hearts that transphobia/homphobia means the other person just hates them because said person is evil incarnate and no attempt to explain to the contrary will ever sink through the brainrot. you might as well go back to 1978 and try to explain to a jonestowner why committing suicide at the behest of a failed monkey salesman might not be the best idea.

(frozen comment) Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
exactly! i was getting definite trans vibes from madeline as i was playing through the game so having the creator confirm that madeline was in fact trans and was a representation of her own gender journey was awesome validation. i would have said that even before the confirmation, a trans reading of madeline was totally valid and should be allowed in games because it's just so there in the text itself.

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
The secret to a successful meme is just doing a tfln rip-off where people copy and past the same starters over and over regardless of if it makes sense

(frozen comment) Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 04:29 am (UTC)(link)
tbh everyone's kind of overlapping points with each other that it ends up looking too much like one end or another because a lot of those points are very dependent on the situation:

not-transphobic
- choosing not to smut with characters whose genitals you do not wish to engage with, but will play gen with them
- being wary of someone whose gender interpretation from the tdm changes to the game without any indication in the app
- being wary of anyone who makes clearly cis characters into trans without justification

transphobic
- immediately calling it fetishizing to make a character trans just because they heacanon them as trans
- justifying how the default will always be cis even if nothing in canon disproves the trans headcanon either
- assuming anyone who has a trans headcanon is going to make them angsty and focus on gender dysphoria
- assuming anyone who has a trans headcanon is a fetishist or using it as therapy

go touch grass
- assuming everyone who doesn't agree with a trans headcanon (even when canon proves it's wrong) is transphobic
- acting like you have to interact with characters who you probably didn't even know existed before this thread occurred

(frozen comment) Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 04:54 am (UTC)(link)
my god, somebody with perspective

(frozen comment) Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 05:06 am (UTC)(link)
wrong theres plenty of perspective on show here

just a lot of it is bad

Re: takes so hot, they'd get you run out of dwrp if your name was attached

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 05:51 am (UTC)(link)
piss warm take at best
tons of people do this already

(frozen comment) Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 05:56 am (UTC)(link)
>"there are no right answers here"
>receives right answer
>*crickets*

never change wg lol

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-02-22 06:27 am (UTC)(link)
i'm ace and love it when ace characters get dicked down

also ace ≠ necessarily sex-repulsed, nonny