ryanongosling: (Default)
Ryan Gosling ([personal profile] ryanongosling) wrote in [community profile] wankgate2024-05-21 06:04 pm

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)
it’s the non-black person being paid for the fetishization of being antiblack

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 07:42 pm (UTC)(link)
https://pastebin.com/kVMZH1pT

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 07:45 pm (UTC)(link)
eh, i can't get that mad about someone getting shitty guys to read poc voices and think about them.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I get it. my baby can be a real bitch sometimes

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)
are you black yourself, anon? or an outsider who feels they should be offended on their behalf?

because if you're the latter, you need to mind your own business and keep your pearlclutching about someone showing their tits as incentive to get people to educate themselves about racism to yourself. it's not helping.

Re: BAKERSTREET

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:08 pm (UTC)(link)
i was a "just scroll" person before and for me nothing has changed except i occasionally see friends get confused that a post they were tagging in vanished lol

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)
look anon i need to get my ally points and if poc won't get offended they should at least let me do it for them so i can be cool on the internet

or else what's the fucking point

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)
This is so bizarre to see in plurk or dwrp spaces. Feels like something you'd hear about fourthand on twitter

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)
what's the account name

+1

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)
op sounds like one of those people who thinks learning a second language is cultural appropriation tbh

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)
this is naya isn't it? lol not surprised she's pulling this shit. i had to block her because i was so sick of seeing her turn up in mutuals plurks with her shitty opinions and abrasive personality. she also hangs out here all the time with her buttbuddies and plurks about it so don't be surprised if this thread fills up with some "anons" whiteknighting her.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)
missnaya on plurk

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)
thanks

not engaging after this but i wanted to say something

for the people above defending this, for the record, you don't have to be Black to find this wildly offensive. you only need a brain. i am Black however, and I do find it wildly offensive.

sa

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)
*people itt, sorry

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)
your voice is noted

any other blacks out there who agree or disagree? what are your takes on someone doing this? ime, opinions among poc in general wildly vary on the same subject so i'm curious how widespread this opinion is among them

white people need not respond

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:46 pm (UTC)(link)
'im Black therefore everyone who disagrees with me has no brain' is not the mic drop you think it is

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)
'other blacks'

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:54 pm (UTC)(link)
jesus, different anon but

1. POC =/= black
2. Any other “blacks” sounds insane
3. “opinions among poc in general wildly vary on the same subject” makes you sound like you’re directing a nature documentary. we’re not a different species. but also, why would any persons of any race all agree on the same thing??

opinions among white people in general wildly vary on the same topic, and that’s so obvious that there’s no need to make mention of it. ime, not all white people feel the same way about strawberry ice cream. do you see how ridiculous that sounds?

burn the whole site

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Im also Black, and while I don't really love this, I also don't think it's worth throwing a huge fit or namedropping someone on wg. from the pastebin, the plurker was looking for legit good sources to get people to engage with, and if it takes the promise of tit pics to get men who otherwise wouldn't lift a finger to educate themselves to actually do some reading, then I figure it's a net good overall. still, it feels pretty gross on an emotional level and i wish they (she?) were doing something different.

but of course this is wg, so I'm sure any nuanced take is gonna be read as white knighting.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:57 pm (UTC)(link)
well said. as a perpetually broke oc player, i used to think ai art was an acceptable answer a few years ago but have learned everything in this comment since and am now instead happily using PBs for all of my characters. because there are a zillion options that do not require money already out there.

just note your icons don't match your character exactly and use a good combo of image refs and descriptions of the differences and your rp will be even more immersive than with accurate icons because of using a multimedia approach etc.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 08:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Has ai art really already been around for a few years? How time flies

sa

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)
also the trick to your "warps character voices" problem besides that, anon, that is a you problem because i have never heard of anyone having this issue before, is twofold:

you can use icons of actors in more than one role (i know some people hate this but i promise lots of people also do not care, if you're willing to use ai you can use a pb from more than one source) and

you can use icons of individuals whose actual media you have never seen and therefore you do not know who the character being played is and cannot accidentally play them instead, plus

you can use stock icons AND

you can even use more than one pb. it's not common anymore but once upon a time people did this frequently.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)
what the fuck is wrong with you

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
hi naya or naya's friends

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-06-21 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)
any reason why you think these right wing assholes she works for will actually read any of what she's giving them? they're paying to laugh and get off on how "woke" and "leftist" she is. they don't give a shit. this isn't activism.