ryanongosling: (Default)
Ryan Gosling ([personal profile] ryanongosling) wrote in [community profile] wankgate2024-05-21 06:04 pm

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 02:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I know more than one person who has respectfully opted out from playing with some of Juu's characters but not all, on opt out posts and she goes nuclear and blocks them

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 02:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know. I think I'd be wary of any mod team that ignored a current players request whether they were the problem party or not. You're knowingly inviting future issues into your game at that point. Along with saying you don't care about your current player bases comfort level.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 02:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah but juu is fucking psycho so that point misses

+1

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 03:08 pm (UTC)(link)
She has issues with several perfectly kind and reasonable players. I don't think banning those players when she's the issue in those instances makes sense.

-1

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 03:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I think trying to join a space with someone you know has issues with you could be an issue itself.

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
im sentencing you to watch this decade-old children's show with the same voice issues for the same reasons for as long as it takes you to realize you're an idiot

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUIixndCOJ8xMsf6IP79s5S_wzvgoL8th&si=seNS4WlNHKC8BjW4

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
unless someone is a big name wanker a lot of these "problem player" issues are probably petty interpersonal bullshit.

i'd tell the concerned player to put in a firm dni with the person they don't want to write with, and tell the one apping in that a condition of being accepted is they don't tag or otherwise contact this player and they'll be banned if they do.

that should be enough for everyone to play nice. definitely wouldn't pre-ban someone otherwise harmless because one player doesn't get on with them. that's literally what dnis are for.

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 03:39 pm (UTC)(link)
When the issues are the kind Juu has with people - up to and including opting out of a single character she plays while playing with her others - I don't think it's on the other player to avoid games she's in. Someone going insane about polite behavior should not necessitate the other party avoiding games they're in. They can just not interact.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 03:51 pm (UTC)(link)
+1 if it were anyone other than juu then i would probably agree with that point, but

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 03:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Deets? Keep hearing about Juu in every single wg post and everyone just posts deetless shit and nothing comes out of it

If Juu is such a fucking psycho, banned in so many games, and has had issues with so many people, someone has gotta have some deets ffs

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 04:07 pm (UTC)(link)
hi juu

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 04:08 pm (UTC)(link)
hi gsai

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 04:55 pm (UTC)(link)
STOP DEADNAMING ME I GO BY G NOW

-1

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 04:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah but how does the other party know the issues go beyond "I opted out of playing with their one character" which is something that in a big enough game shouldn't matter? Like they could never interact at all in s big game, which I would say fm is.

Also I like to think mods would consider a ban of someone if more than one player had complaints then just one player having complaints that may not be anything ban worthy. (Ie: one person is probably a personality clash, multiple people is something else.)

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 04:58 pm (UTC)(link)
+10000000 THIS

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 04:58 pm (UTC)(link)
rubi is wanker containment for sure, the game itself is high quality but it has a playerbase full of people who were wankers of yore. the kind of person where you probably don't know their name because they're low key too cliquey to be well known but if you can dig up old threads for eudio, eachdraich, pines, meadowlark, and duplicity, you'll see overlap between the names mentioned in giant wank explosions and the rubi taken list.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 05:03 pm (UTC)(link)
So rubi is more of a ticking time bomb than wank happening right now

Re: BAKERSTREET

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 05:11 pm (UTC)(link)
*someone who puts m/f ONLY in their prefs

fixed that for you

-signed, afab player who likes having their male character take it up the ass, but preferably by a hot lady in a strap

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 05:12 pm (UTC)(link)
says you, i love it

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 05:13 pm (UTC)(link)
i mean yeah pillow queens of any variety are boring

weird of you to assume i also don't or won't play other things

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 05:17 pm (UTC)(link)
gsai has """quit""" rp like, three times

i doubt it will ever stick

Re: GOLDEN PEACOCK

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 05:21 pm (UTC)(link)
+1 i like golden retriever boyfriends and twinks getting pegged as much as anyone else but what's even more fun is having bottom twinks get real thirsty and horny and barely able to control themselves

switching is great, actually, especially in the context of an established femdom situation. there's so much you can do when you don't pigeonhole (hah) yourself into boring situations

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 05:28 pm (UTC)(link)
+1 this was my experience in lab too. great at first but then That One Obnoxious Player and their asspat brigade gets in and brings the ic and ooc quality of the game down.

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 05:36 pm (UTC)(link)
this is wg, give me a name 👀

Re: GAME PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2024-05-26 05:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know if she was ever in fm but in lab Beth/murgy is the one I think of when I read this