wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

what on earth would blue do with our IP addresses, tag all our characters badly???

if this is true, that's pretty fucked up. just for that, i'm going to tag her.

truly shocking that you think anything in this thread constitutes more than flimsy grasping at straws

two of them, huh? sheesh. seeing there was wank on the game, i figured a yon tantrum was coming from the start, the aggression is why i blocked him. (which is a shame because he's solid at rp and still the only good azula player i've come across on dw)

it's still crazy to think that at least one other mod, two if yon wasn't one, would bring this up at all. the wank itself was so clearly grudgey bait, but shaming players for going on wg when clearly the mods are here to see it, themselves? bad look.

and since at least some of you are here, i've got to point out that you guys had the rare experience of nothingburger wank dropping about your game and wg coming to your defense by calling it out as dumb wank. the smart move is never to engage but here especially, why would you?

ignoring it and moving was the move, cause i doubt i'm the only one hearing this and rethinking my dismissal of lab wank.

blue you're not helping, you're just being obvious

people should really stop, this weak-ass wank would've been forgotten by now if you weren't defending yourself against literally nothing

what exactly did they say in these plurks

bold of you to assume im not a driveby anon who just thinks this is all very stupid and is tired of seeing you try to drag it back up

again with the grasping at straws

fyi it helps if you space your comments a little further apart so we can't see you on flatview desperately trying to spin this into actual wank

this will probably be taken as more dunking on lab, but is there a reason people think this is all one person. did i miss someone getting super buttmad over this game in the past

genuine response: yeah, actually, you did. on this very post, even

yeah i saw the start of this, obviously, but people brought up past wank on the game from the same person.

i don't doubt it, just want deets

the other big one on this post was because they didn't let a wanker hide their identity

Misfire?

its also a classic case of "the failure mode of clever is asshole."

being clever, especially jerk clever, takes a level of skill most of these clowns don't have. and if you fail at clever, you usually land in asshole

You should, the player is a sweetheart they didn't deserve Jade's bullshit.

I had not seen that and thought someone was lost on their way to the Tai thread, thanks.

But nah, that's not like the sweep player wank. That was actually handled badly. Deadnaming is shitty, period. Either require the old handle be noted on the taken list or something, or don't let the wanker in if you're worried they're going to hurt other players.

that was guaranteed the minute her ship partner dropped

idk why people still try to get cr with her dazai

what's her beef with the jinx?

earlier lab grudgewank. again the person who got swept didn't cause drama over it but a third party brought it to wg. looks like someone's looking for any reason they can find to get mad at this game.

OK yeah, that's another wtf one. AC requirements are so laid back these days, what a weird hill to die on when you aren't even the one who was swept

Didn't like how the player wrote Jinx and bragged she wrote her so much better. Petty shit and seemed unnecessarily mean at the time.

i considered exp because i missed being in a bsd cast buuuuuuut then i saw alisa and mir from prismatica were in it and bailed out

the bsd cast at prismatica was a hot mess

okay g

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

Page 210 of 308

251: back in my day wank meant something

Re: ayrt

Re: +2

Re: ayrt

Re: +1

Re: dda

Re: ayrt

Re: +1

Re: ayrt

Re: +1

da

Re: da

ayrt

Re: ayrt

Re: ayrt

https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/66525.html?thread=267591389#cmt267591389

no subject

Re: +2

no subject

Re: +2

Re: +2

https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/65798.html?thread=265116678#cmt265116678

Re: https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/65798.html?thread=265116678#cmt265116678

Re: +2

Re: +2

no subject