wankgate | 251: back in my day wank meant something

251: back in my day wank meant something

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

so the heinous malleable protag is played by denise's very close personal friend whom she personally whiteknights for on wg, kit?

oh my

so who's this about, spill the deets

wait, SA here and i just re-read this and noticed the even weirder part about how you used to wash them once a month and that was somehow 2-3 uses? did you shower 2-3 times a month??? anon what is happening

i can't tell what's a joke anymore

i need everyone to use shifty eyes if they're being ironic please

if you don't interact with malleable protags or fandom ocs you won't run into them, and even if you do you'd have to be willing to deal with overwhelmingly pretentious tumblresque writing

I do fuck with those though

which is why I asked you to spill

they washed ALL their towels once a month

each towel = 2-3 uses
several towels per month

hope that helps

if it helps, it's referencing when folkmore mod kit was namedropped and totally-not-kit commented implying kit is close bosom buddies with denise (who also monitors wg 24/7 in case she needs to defend her bestest friend kit) in what i can only assume was a cringe scare tactic.

multiple towels washed at the same time, once a month

presumably the number of times they shower in a month divided by the number of towels they had meant each towel was getting used 2-3 times per monthly wash cycle

i don't see how that's unclear anon

i knew that part, i just couldn't tell if the person namedropping kit was joking or actually namedropping kit

now that i wrote it out it's obviously a joke and i'll report to the chicken immediately

if it doesn't sound familiar you're in the clear. you might be in the clear anyway since these are anonymous comments and nobody is a mind reader no matter how smug some anons are being. there's a high chance that naming who some anons think it is would be wrong and be tar and feathering someone whose only crime is having flowery writing for their oc.

with what some wg anons think is ~too much~ I wouldn't be surprised if they thought the "purple prose" was just a tag more than a sentence long with an adjective in there somewhere.

+1 people have posted shota prompts in that thread plenty of times past with no issue, if it's content labeled and posted in the correct thread then it can stay

generally people post with iconless socks, and not with an icon that's straight up ai-generated explicit shota porn for all of flatview to see before they can scroll by fast enough

+1 not only is it bad form to post a shota icon in rpa, there's also issues with generative ai databases scraping photographs of real-life children and actual csam. i don't have a problem with loli/shota porn as long as no real kids are involved, but i don't trust ai generated shota art because i don't know what data the program is basing it on

if the bootyblasted entitled protag player only ever talks about rp but never tags it could very well be kit.

dumb "i'm not like the other wankgaters" comment lmao. nobody would call someone's prose tumblr-like just because it's not inserting another finger. where has wg even been shitting on long tags lately?

i already said how i'm going to recognize not to tag you, unless you really are too chicken to write your preferences now. looks like you want to tag me so bad it makes you stupid lol

oh wait

do you think there's only one person on this entire site whose permissions say no malleable protags? do you just not look at permissions posts?

and saying this is a guarantee it won't happen

+1

this is exactly what gets to me about it. actual fictional shota/loli, drawn porn, idgaf. we're all adults here and kinks & fetishes tend to be highly symbolic. but ai scrapers trawl the internet at large, including the shitty awful parts of it, and the idea that someone's ai-generated porn art might be based off of actual csam makes me sick to my stomach.

hit dogs holler lmao

you must not be paying attention, this shitshow happens every few weeks

i look at them frequently which is why i have a pretty good idea of who is doing it

dumb comment because they absolutely would, this is wg. none of us have anything of value to say

grass emoji. hand emoji

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

Page 72 of 308

251: back in my day wank meant something

Re: da

Re: da

Re: da

no subject

Re: da

Re: da

Re: da

no subject

Re: da

no subject

Re: da

Re: da

dda

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: da

Re: dda

Re: da

Re: da

no subject

Re: MEME PET PEEVES

Re: dda

Re: da

Re: dda

Re: da