wankgate | 252: imagine all the tags sitting neglected in inboxes for this

252: imagine all the tags sitting neglected in inboxes for this

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

My thoughts exactly, anon. I’ve seen that crap so many times and somehow it’s HORRIBLE and ICKY if it’s m/f but oh so cute if it’s m/m.

Hypocrites.

im gonna write about me killing you because then itll become real and ill never have to see your shit tier bait again

god you're stupid

you wanna kiss me so bad

"touch grass"

"randomly tell someone you write porn"

you've never even seen grass much less touched it, post discarded

this is the only logical answer

fuck lmao

won't someone think of the straight people, they have literally no media that caters to them

sniff sniff

this comment smells

the way the defensive yaoihounds in this thread keep trying to turn this into "won't somebody think of the st8s" when literally nobody but them is saying that

i think all of us are doing our best to not think of the states actually

imagine something being gay is more interesting than when it’s straight

https://wankgate.dreamwidth.org/66578.html?thread=271002642#cmt271002642

can’t read can you someone did in fact ask won’t someone think about the straights

nah. ~this but gay~ is still boring.

slightly less so if it's f/f but still boring.

shaming women for being into shit is still misogyny even if it's against straight women, my guy

ftr both sides of this argument are fucking tired

women can like m/m and it's cool, they don't deserve to be called out
women can like hetslop and it's cool
women can like proghet or whatever the hell you want to call it, idgaf.

I'm just tired of misogyny being paraded out in a new trendy outfit, just so we can couch our hatred of women in progressive terms. society has never liked how women engage with media. no matter how they do it, it's always wrong.

if I could inb4 myself, i'd inb4 somebody calls me a cockhop.

obvi women liking f/f is also cool, but I didn't throw it up there because part of the conversation is about how dwrp is going to center m/m or m/f since the playbase is primarily straight or male-preferring bisexual women (with the occasional amab or trans guy, usually gay).

cool. i disagree.

I respect your take even if I think you’re wrong.

op not once shamed women

just because women happen to like something doesn’t mean disliking/criticizing that something is misogyny

gay people going i don’t care for m/f and/or most m/f tropes is not misogyny

you’re thinking about yourself too much here

it’s so fucking tiresome how gay people can’t say heterosexuality bores them without people like you totting out misogyny. some of us are women and still don’t give a shit about m/f. don’t care if the participants are bi, trans, whatever. it’s the m/f tropes that are almost always brought that put me off. want m/f? look everywhere else but a niche hobby where queer people are over represented

Saying you’re not into something is fine. I’m not talking about op. I’m addressing the value judgements this thread is full of.

Also, not that it matters, I’m a lesbian who plays straight male characters, so I don’t really have a dog in the ‘straight women playing straight female characters’ race.

honestly i would rp more f/f if there were more buff strong woman protecting their more dainty and delicate girlfriends dynamics in dwrp

I don’t think we’ll agree, anon, so I’m just going to say I understand where you’re coming from, but at this point I think the waters are muddied re: “I think het is boring” vs “I think pairings involving women are boring”

you’re trolling but I did start this hobby as a bi woman and transitioned into a gay man

became the yaoi i wanted to see in the world i guess

had a lot of fun rping as the male damsel in distress to another man’s shiny knight in armor. helped that it was canon

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

Page 273 of 298

252: imagine all the tags sitting neglected in inboxes for this

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

no subject

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

sa

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

Re: +1

+1