252: imagine all the tags sitting neglected in inboxes for this

[ryanongosling]

Please mark any spoilers clearly and try not to spoil stuff that hasn't even aired yet for people.

Keep the rules in mind.

LATEST PAGE | LATEST FLATVIEW PAGE

Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Mods' Pet Peeves | Game Pet Peeves | Plurk Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves

Report stupid shit here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

you can do what you want, but most people here demonstrably don't want to write with someone who's so bad at writing it's actually noticeable. as in, they stand out on bakerstreet as a bad writer

but again, you're allowed to tag them

[(Anonymous)]

yes, that's what i was saying? that people should have fun tagging the way they and those they're rping with want?

maybe because i don't rp on bakerstreet, i'm missing something where this person's writing is bad to the point of being incomprehensible and hard to tag with, but what people are saying here is this person a bad rper because they sacrifice characterization for kink

okay, sure. who cares? i don't doubt they do that. i bet they're having fun doing it, too. clearly you wanted it to be the case that i rp with them so i'm defending them, but i hate to tell you: people can be uninvolved with what offends you and still think your take is dumb

and let's be real, "you can do that, most of us have standards" is a really flawed argument against "people should have fun how they want"

[(Anonymous)]

idk maybe you should scroll up and check what kind of connection you're commenting on because you're going off on your own soapbox here about stuff no one was saying

[(Anonymous)]

*conversation. not connection

[(Anonymous)]

cannot tell if you're a little dumb or just really stubborn in your defensiveness but dude, really?

someine decided the real problem here isn't op getting tagged someone they don't tag back or the weirdness of using that as a passive-agressive flex, instead what we should be discussing that a rper who might be op doesn't care about characterization in their kinky smut rp. that was already changing the kind of conversation from "rpers are bad at social"

getting a response to your complaint of people having fun but writing poorly isn't changing the discussion just because it takes it in a direction you don't like, sorry to say

i suggest instead of watching people be dumb and bad at things, you go ahead and actually do your tags that you will enjoy. i'll help by doing the same

[(Anonymous)]

what the hell are you talking about lol

[(Anonymous)]

i had to scroll up myself just to make sure i'm not high but no, it was really

"good writers can write kink without sacrificing characterization" (context: a specific person's characters all sound the same)

you: