ryanongosling: (Default)
Ryan Gosling ([personal profile] ryanongosling) wrote in [community profile] wankgate2025-02-08 11:45 am

Re: SHEEP

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
the other one

the one who was banned from labyrinthum

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
no, literally no one complained about this, the Morph player just likes to jerk themselves off about how everyone else in game is whiny

the complaint was that limiting 15 comments AC to max 3 threads was challenging to people who seek out a lot of new CR rather than tag the same standby's over and over

in other words.............. the opposite issue

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
you say this like they don't post the link in the main discord once a month are you ok anon

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
it's true, you've accurately recounted a plurk you were not in and didn't ever read

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
morph go jerk off somewhere else

Re: https://expiationooc.dreamwidth.org/35085.html

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 02:30 am (UTC)(link)
gj you anon. no one can read in this thread.

Re: SHEEP

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
banned for what?

Re: EMU

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 02:40 am (UTC)(link)
yeah, alright, legend

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 02:48 am (UTC)(link)
they clearly haven’t been mia but no one wants to say anything about that. they also made sure to keep their inactive character in the game too.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
So, were you really proud of your character's ic wedding and thought other people enjoyed it? Or is the bee in your bonnet just there 'cause a new post happened on mean ol' wankgate?

Wasn't in this discussion before, not planning to be in it again. Just. You're being weird and intense, try touching grass

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 02:57 am (UTC)(link)
The Spock player made a 600+ comment plurk whining about AC, anon. And a few others chimed in about AC being too high. The slow taggers have been bitching since the game opened and been trying to get the mods to change it ever since.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
the horse is dead stop trying to fuck it

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 03:05 am (UTC)(link)
yeah that's an example of no hook so it's beyond writing skill and onto just sucking at rp. you can be bad at writing craft but still good at rp and vice versa

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
we believe you anon who definitely never read the plurk

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
while i would never join this game personally having a space for people who would rather just talk about characters than rp isn't a problem except in that this is wankgate

there are people who just want to plan and not actually rp, let them do that. the problem is when physically disabled players are assumed to be the target audience. many physically disabled players have inconsistent speeds but i don't know any who would rather plot than rp.

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
Someone just post the damn deets and settle this shit.

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
waiting for you to reply to the actual content of my comment

I'll just keep waiting

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 03:13 am (UTC)(link)
THIS is what makes it weirder. having a friends server loosely associated with a game because all the friends rp together is normal, but advertising it in the official discord has turned the corner into bizarro world.

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 03:17 am (UTC)(link)
Wait I don't get it. They can't get a thread with new CR to five comments three times? I'm lost as to the problem unless this game is a lot smaller than I thought. Or unless it's supposed to be 15 comments three times and not 15 comments total. I understand not being able to get a 30 tag inbox thread with new cr, but nobody is asking for that. Even allowing for tag outs that aren't answered, they have over 60 players, three people will tag you back four times!

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
+1 this is how we all end up wanting to see the plurk. show us the plurk. don't just constantly reference the plurk.

Re: https://expiationooc.dreamwidth.org/35085.html

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 03:20 am (UTC)(link)
i am a little disappointed as i expected these mods to suck somehow. i am seeing evidence of ... good or at least decent modding. at least airt warned it wasn't wanky.

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 03:33 am (UTC)(link)
weird boner you have for them

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 03:33 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry people you don't like got something they wanted that must suck

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
right so all of these people HAVE BEEN making activity, just to be clear. it's not impossible

but it gets legitimately really frustrating because the events don't get posted until halfway through the month, so if you start 5-10 chunky meaty threads on the 20th, you might only get 3 tags each by the 31st and you've actually failed AC

it's just a silly technicality that was penalizing people who were actively engaging in the game, who asked for a rule change about the thread limit and not about anything else. it was not anything worth coming to WG over. except there's this known player who is whiny as hell and comes here trying to make a fuss about nothing

Re: EXPIATION

(Anonymous) 2025-02-10 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
AC in expiation is:

(5 comments)
(5 comments)
(5 comments)

or

(10 comments)
(5 comments )

or

(8 comments)
(3 comments)
(4 comments)

so on and so forth

As long as the result ends in 15 in 2 or 3 threads, you pass. Or you can just submit a ridiculous long thread like

(20 comments)
(2 comments)

that's good too. Some players are having difficulties with meeting these requirements.