(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 07:19 am (UTC)(link)
It's plurk's april fool's joke.

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 07:24 am (UTC)(link)
try boomerang tagging the older ones if they're still keen to finish them. all you have to do is set a time with the other mun and finish it off as fast as you can. there's backtagging, and then there's backtagging forever and that really ends up clogging things like you're experiencing now.

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 07:26 am (UTC)(link)
i've only taken a quick cursory glance over it but it lost me when it sounded more like that shitty korra show.

sa

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 07:28 am (UTC)(link)
...this comment went in the wrong place

guess it's time for bed after all

Re: LUNAR AKA HATEBONER

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 07:29 am (UTC)(link)
Now I can only picture dad as Lunar, that motorcycle-dog boss from Mischief Makers.

Re: -1

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 07:31 am (UTC)(link)
You just described good prose.

You just stick brackets around it. It's downright hilarious. What you describe doing in your special brackets is what prose rpers have been doing since the beginning.

This is why bracket RPers are such jokes, you don't even understand that you are already writing regular prose. You just make it hard to read for some people. You're basically a particularly -pathetic homestuck player sticking to special formatting for no reason.

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 07:32 am (UTC)(link)
better yet would be if each game had their own thread and players responded to THAT ONE instead of posting their own. there's so much shit to wade through for the same games it's unreal.

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 07:54 am (UTC)(link)
for the longest time I thought it was mother fucker why

Re: http://oc-sws.dreamwidth.org/profile

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 07:54 am (UTC)(link)
- See a That Lauren muse the first in the list of members.
- Click the cross and back away as quick as fuck.

DA

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 07:59 am (UTC)(link)
And you sound like a butthurt prose person.

DA

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 08:04 am (UTC)(link)
No, I said it about Alph on here from my own delicate brain.

He is the origin.

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 08:07 am (UTC)(link)
He's a dreadful basement dweller had has referred to some characters as his waifu.

Also tries to start romantic relationships with girls he talks to OOCly to the point he asks them to leave their boyfriend on the first conversation ever. He is a Nice Guy who is basically playing himself with Flynn's face.

Cuh-reap-ee.

Re: itt: games you're shocked are still alive

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 08:21 am (UTC)(link)
ruby city and somarium

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 08:24 am (UTC)(link)
tbh I feel kind of bad for her for reasons other than being tagged by shitty players, since that's a given at tlh (and I say that as a regular player). Whenever she posts she inevitably ends up with a spotlight on her over here because anons want to make her their champion against nice guys.

Re: EXPLORATION ZERO

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 08:45 am (UTC)(link)
The games dont share mods, the mods here ripped shit from a bunch of games including concepts

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 09:16 am (UTC)(link)
it's weird how often she's linked here

beginning to think either she's doing it herself or she has a creepy whiteknight stalker

-1

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 09:28 am (UTC)(link)
I don't see butthurt. I see honesty. Tags you can reply to? That's well-written. Tags with introspection that gives the other player nothing to go off of for their character's reply? That is not good writing, prose or brackets! Unless I'm tagging with a character who's actually reading others' minds, I don't care for rambly introspection that doesn't give me anything else to go off of either!

The point is, if you take good writing and just delete the brackets, and put quotation marks around the dialog instead? That is called prose. It works just fine. Past tense, present tense, prose can be either!

The question here is over presentation, like the smalltext nonsense, or punctuation, brackets versus quotation marks. That is the only real defining difference between the two styles, in my experience.

da

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 09:30 am (UTC)(link)
As one of the anons who +1'd them? Fuck you. You do not have to be a men's rights activist to believe that hating on one particular group of people is a dumb fucking thing to do. It's backward thinking and it's the kind of bullshit that gives feminism a negative meaning.

It is not and will never be okay to mindlessly hate on a gender group. How is that such a complicated line of thinking? It's not difficult to use words like 'some' instead of all.

Re: PLURK PET PEEVES

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 09:32 am (UTC)(link)
man i consistently blame that stuff for why my canon's fanbase is shitty but it's still my canon's fanbase and it'd take a lot more than that for me to genuinely dislike something

for instance, the something in question being really bad or just not enjoyable to me

hating things because of a fandom or hype is the stupidest shit it just, like you said, reeks of WAH STOP LIKING WHAT I DON'T LIKE

p. much all fandoms suck anyway lbr

Re: AATHER

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 09:44 am (UTC)(link)
hi ginshu

Re: ITT: BORING CHARACTERS

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 09:46 am (UTC)(link)
you just described how every FF7 character is played

wiki + AC

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 09:53 am (UTC)(link)
good, maybe that'll cut down on the "4chan does it therefore it's cool" attitude i've seen here before

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 10:01 am (UTC)(link)
*your

Re: sa

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 10:05 am (UTC)(link)
i think john watson in sherlock could be an interesting character between his military medical service, his danger addiction and his weird codependency/lack of a backbone

but man, even the show aggressively clings to making him as boring as possible

Re: LUNAR AKA HATEBONER

(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 10:05 am (UTC)(link)
HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERE'S LUNAR